Volume 40 Issue 10
Oct.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yanguang Fu, Yikai Feng, Dongxu Zhou, Xinghua Zhou. Absolute sea level variability of Arctic Ocean in 1993–2018 from satellite altimetry and tide gauge observations[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40(10): 76-83. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1820-4
Citation: Yanguang Fu, Yikai Feng, Dongxu Zhou, Xinghua Zhou. Absolute sea level variability of Arctic Ocean in 1993–2018 from satellite altimetry and tide gauge observations[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40(10): 76-83. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1820-4

Absolute sea level variability of Arctic Ocean in 1993–2018 from satellite altimetry and tide gauge observations

doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1820-4
Funds:  The Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Survey Technology and Application, Ministry of Natural Resource under contract No. MESTA-2020-B005; the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation under contract No. ZR2020QD087; the National Key R&D Program of China under contract Nos 2017YFC0306003 and 2016YFB0501703; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 42104035 and 41706115.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: ygfu@fio.org.cnykfeng@fio.org.cn
  • Received Date: 2020-09-08
  • Accepted Date: 2021-02-01
  • Available Online: 2021-09-06
  • Publish Date: 2021-10-30
  • Arctic absolute sea level variations were analyzed based on multi-mission satellite altimetry data and tide gauge observations for the period of 1993–2018. The range of linear absolute sea level trends were found −2.00 mm/a to 6.88 mm/a excluding the central Arctic, positive trend rates were predominantly located in shallow water and coastal areas, and negative rates were located in high-latitude areas and Baffin Bay. Satellite-derived results show that the average secular absolute sea level trend was (2.53±0.42) mm/a in the Arctic region. Large differences were presented between satellite-derived and tide gauge results, which are mainly due to low satellite data coverage, uncertainties in tidal height processing and vertical land movement (VLM). The VLM rates at 11 global navigation satellite system stations around the Arctic Ocean were analyzed, among which 6 stations were tide gauge co-located, the results indicate that the absolute sea level trends after VLM corrected were of the same magnitude as satellite altimetry results. Accurately calculating VLM is the primary uncertainty in interpreting tide gauge measurements such that differences between tide gauge and satellite altimetry data are attributable generally to VLM.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Andersen O B, Piccioni G. 2016. Recent Arctic sea level variations from satellites. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3: 76. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2016.00076
    [2]
    Bamber J, Riva R. 2010. The sea level fingerprint of 21st century ice mass fluxes. The Cryosphere Discussions, 4: 1593–1606. doi: 10.5194/tcd-4-1593-2010
    [3]
    Carret A, Johannessen J A, Andersen O B, et al. 2017. Arctic sea level during the satellite altimetry era. Surveys in Geophysics, 38(1): 251–275. doi: 10.1007/s10712-016-9390-2
    [4]
    Cheng Yongcun, Andersen O B, Knudsen P. 2015. An improved 20-year Arctic Ocean altimetric sea level data record. Marine Geodesy, 38(2): 146–162. doi: 10.1080/01490419.2014.954087
    [5]
    Church J A, Clark P U, Cazenave A, et al. 2013. Sea level change. In: Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K, eds. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    [6]
    Feng Xiangbo, Tsimplis M N, Marcos M, et al. 2015. Spatial and temporal variations of the seasonal sea level cycle in the northwest Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research, 120(10): 7091–7112
    [7]
    Fu Yanguang, Zhou Xinghua, Sun Weikang, et al. 2019. Hybrid model combining empirical mode decomposition, singular spectrum analysis, and least squares for satellite-derived sea-level anomaly prediction. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(20): 7817–7829. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1606959
    [8]
    Henry O, Prandi P, Llovel W, et al. 2012. Tide gauge-based sea level variations since 1950 along the Norwegian and Russian coasts of the Arctic Ocean: contribution of the steric and mass components. Journal of Geophysical Research, 117(C6): C06023. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007706
    [9]
    Holgate S J, Matthews A, Woodworth P L, et al. 2013. New data systems and products at the permanent service for mean sea level. Journal of Coastal Research, 29(3): 493–504. doi: 10.2112/jcoastres-d-12-00175.1
    [10]
    Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, et al. 1996. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 77(3): 437–472. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2
    [11]
    Kwok R, Cunningham G F, Wensnahan M, et al. 2009. Thinning and volume loss of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover: 2003–2008. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(C7): C07005. doi: 10.1029/2009JC005312
    [12]
    Luu Q H, Tkalich P, Tay T W. 2015. Sea level trend and variability around Peninsular Malaysia. Ocean Science, 11(4): 617–628. doi: 10.5194/os-11-617-2015
    [13]
    McPhee M G, Proshutinsky A, Morison J H, et al. 2009. Rapid change in freshwater content of the Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 36(10): L10602. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037525
    [14]
    Polyakov I V, Beszczynska A, Carmack E C, et al. 2005. One more step toward a warmer Arctic. Geophysical Research Letters, 32(17): L17605. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023740
    [15]
    Proshutinsky A, Ashik I M, Dvorkin E N, et al. 2004. Secular sea level change in the Russian sector of the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 190(C3): C03042. doi: 10.1029/2003JC002007
    [16]
    Proshutinsky A, Ashik I, Häkkinen S, et al. 2007. Sea level variability in the Arctic Ocean from AOMIP models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(C4): C04S08. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003916
    [17]
    Proshutinsky A, Pavlov V, Bourke R H. 2001. Sea level rise in the Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 28(11): 2237–2240. doi: 10.1029/2000GL012760
    [18]
    Rose S K, Andersen O B, Passaro M, et al. 2019. Arctic Ocean sea level record from the complete radar altimetry era: 1991–2018. Remote Sensing, 11(14): 1672. doi: 10.3390/rs11141672
    [19]
    Santamaría-Gómez A, Gravelle M, Collilieux X, et al. 2012. Mitigating the effects of vertical land motion in tide gauge records using a state-of-the-art GPS velocity field. Global and Planetary Change, 98–99: 6–17. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.07.007
    [20]
    Santamaría-Gómez A, Gravelle M, Dangendorf S, et al. 2017. Uncertainty of the 20th century sea-level rise due to vertical land motion errors. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 473: 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2017.05.038
    [21]
    Svendsen P L, Andersen O B, Nielsen A A. 2015. Statistical selection of tide gauges for Arctic sea-level reconstruction. Advances in Space Research, 55(9): 2305–2314. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.01.017
    [22]
    Woodworth P L, Player R. 2003. The permanent service for mean sea level: an update to the 21st century. Journal of Coastal Research, 19(2): 287–295
    [23]
    Wöppelmann G, Marcos M. 2016. Vertical land motion as a key to understanding sea level change and variability. Reviews of Geophysics, 54(1): 64–92. doi: 10.1002/2015RG000502
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (391) PDF downloads(32) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return