Mantle melting factors and amagmatic crustal accretion of the Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean
-
摘要: 扩张速率是控制全球洋中脊地幔熔融和构造活动的一级因素。Gakkel洋中脊的扩张速率从西往东逐步变小, 但是地壳厚度却依次分为厚薄相间的四个区域。这表明, Gakkel洋中脊区域地幔熔融和扩张速率却并不完全相关, 地幔温度、地幔含水量和地幔物质组成等其它因素在地壳增生中起到了重要作用。参照重力反演地壳厚度, 本文利用湿熔融模型推断出Gakkel洋中脊下的四个区域分别对应1270℃、1220℃、1280℃和1280℃的地幔位势温度(假定全球平均地幔含水量), 或者210 ppm、0 ppm、340 ppm以及280 ppm的地幔含水量(假定1260℃地幔位势温度)。西部地壳减薄区对应低温地幔, 而其它三个区域主要受到扩张速率减慢导致的传导作用增加的影响。沿Gakkel洋中脊, 地壳厚度和岩石采样类型具有良好的一致性。在地壳厚度小于1.5 km的区域, 岩石采样几乎全部为蛇纹岩化橄榄岩;在地壳厚度大于2.5 km的区域, 岩石采样几乎全部为玄武岩;在地壳厚度为1.5-2.5 km的区域, 岩石采样中混杂了各类岩石。依据此一致性, Gakkel洋中脊传统的岩浆增生区域仅占44%, 非岩浆增生区域占到29%的区域, 非岩浆的扩张方式在超慢速洋中脊的形成过程中起了重要作用。
-
关键词:
- Gakkel洋中脊 /
- 剩余地幔布格重力异常 /
- 地壳厚度 /
- 湿熔融 /
- 非岩浆地壳增生
Abstract: Spreading rate is a primary factor of mantle melting and tectonic behavior of the global mid-ocean ridges. The spreading rate of the Gakkel ridge decreases gradually from west to east. However, the Gakkel ridge can be divided into four thick-and-thin zones with varying crustal thicknesses along ridge axis. This phenomenon indicates that mantle melting of the Gakkel ridge is not a simple function of spreading rate. Mantle temperature, water content, mantle composition, and other factors are important in crustal accretion processes. Based on gravity-derived crustal thickness and wet melting model, we estimate that the mantle potential temperatures of the four zones are 1 270, 1 220, 1 280, and 1 280℃ (assuming that mantle water content equals to global average value), with corresponding mantle water contents of 210, 0, 340, and 280 mg/kg (assuming that mantle potential temperature is 1 260℃), respectivly. The western thinned crust zone is best modeled with low mantle temperature, whereas the other zones are mainly controlled by the enhanced conduction caused by the slower spreading rate. Along the Gakkel ridge, the crustal thickness is consistent with rock samples types. Predominated serpentinized peridotite and basalt are found in the area with crustal thickness <1.5 km and >2.5 km, respectively. The rock samples are including from basalt to peridotite in the area with crustal thickness between 1.5 and 2.5 km. Based on this consistency, the traditional magmatic accretion zone accounted for only 44% and amagmatic accretion accounted for 29% of the Gakkel ridge. The amagmatic accretion is a significant characteristic of the ultra-slow spreading ridge.-
Key words:
- Gakkel ridge /
- residual mantle bouguer anomaly /
- crustal thickness /
- wet melting /
- amagmatic accretion
-
Asimow P D, Langmuir C H. 2003. The importance of water to ocean-ic mantle melting regimes. Nature, 421: 815-820 Behn M D, Boettcher M S, Hirth G. 2007. Thermal structure of ocean-ic transform faults. Geology, 35(4): 307-310 Cannat M, Sauter D, Bezos A, et al. 2008. Spreading rate, spreading obliquity, and melt supply at the ultraslow spreading Southw-est Indian Ridge. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 9(4): 144, doi: 10.1029/2007GC001676 Cannat M, Sauter D, Mendel V, et al. 2006. Modes of seafloor genera-tion at a melt-poor ultraslow-spreading ridge. Geology, 34(7): 605-608 Chen Y J. 1996. Constraints on melt production rate beneath the mid-ocean ridges based on passive flow models. Pure Appl Geo-phys, 146(34): 589-620 Coakley B J, Cochran J R. 1998. Gravity evidence of very thin crust at the Gakkel Ridge (Arctic Ocean). Earth Planet Sci Lett, 162(1-4): 81-95 Davies J H, Bickle M. 1991. A physical model for the volume and com-position of melt produced by hydrous fluxing above subduc-tion zones. Phil Trans: R Soc London, 335(1638): 355-364 DeMets C, Gordon R G, Argus D F, et al. 1990. Current plate motions. Geophys J Int, 101(2): 425-478 Dick H J B, Lin Jian, Schouten H. 2003. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge. Nature, 426(6965): 405-412 Divins D L. 2003. Total Sediment Thickness of the World's Oceans and Marginal Seas. Boulder, CO: NOAA National Geophysical Data Center Edwards M H, Kurras G J, Tolstoy M, et al. 2001. Evidence of recent volcanic activity on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge. Nature, 409: 808-812 Georgen J E, Lin Jian, Dick H J B. 2001. Evidence from gravity anom-alies for interactions of the Marion and Bouvet hotspots with the Southwest Indian Ridge: effects of transform offsets. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 187(3-4): 283-300 Jakobsson M, Mayer L, Coakley B, et al. 2012. The international ba-thymetric chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) version 3.0. Geo-phys Res Lett, 39(12): L12609, doi: 10.1029/2012GL052219 Jokat W, Ritzmann O, Schmidt-Aursch M C, et al. 2003. Geophysical evidence for reduced melt production on the Arctic ultraslow Gakkel mid-ocean ridge. Nature, 423(6943): 962-965 Jokat W, Schmidt-Aursch M C. 2007. Geophysical characteristics of the ultraslow spreading Gakkel Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Geophys J Int, 168(3): 983-998 Kenyon S, Forsberg R, Coakley B. 2008. New gravity field for the Arc-tic. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 89(32): 289-290 Langmuir C H, Forsyth D W. 2007. Mantle melting beneath mid-ocean ridges. Oceanography, 20(1): 78-89 Langmuir C H, Klein E M, Plank T. 1992. Petrological systematics of mid-ocean ridge basalts: Constraints on melt generation be-neath ocean ridges. In: Morgan J P, Blackman D K, Sinton J M, eds. Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges. Geophys Monogr Ser, 71: 361 McKenzie D P, Bickle M J. 1988. The volume and composition of melt generated by extension of the lithosphere. J Petrol, 29: 625-679 Michael P J, Langmuir C H, Dick H, et al. 2003. Magmatic and amag-matic seafloor generation at the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature, 423: 956-961 Muller M R, Minshull T A, White R S. 2000. Crustal structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at the Atlantis II fracture zone. J Geo-phys Res, 105(B11): 25809-25828 Müller R D, Sdrolias M, Gaina C, et al. 2008. Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world's ocean crust. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 9(4): Q04006, doi: 10.1029/2007GC001743 Oldenburg D W. 1974. The inversion and interpretation of gravity an-omalies. Geophysics, 39(4): 526-536 Reid I, Jackson H R. 1981. Oceanic spreading rate and crustal thick-ness. Mar Geophys Res, 5(2): 165-172 Robinson C J, Bickle M J, Minshull T A, et al. 2001. Low degree melt-ing under the Southwest Indian Ridge: the roles of mantle tem-perature, conductive cooling and wet melting. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 188(3-4): 383-398 Taylor P T, Kovacs L C, Vogt P R, et al. 1981. Detailed aeromagnetic investigation of the Arctic Basin: 2. J Geophys Res, 86(B7): 6323-6333 Wessel P, Smith W H F. 1995. New version of the Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans AGU, 76: 329 White R S, McKenzie D, O'Nions R K. 1992. Oceanic crustal thickness from seismic measurements and rare earth element inversions. J Geophys Res, 97(B13): 19683-19715 Zhang Tao, Lin Jian, Gao Jinyao. 2013. Magmatism and tectonic pro-cesses in Area a hydrothermal vent on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Sci China: Earth Sci, 56(12): 2186-2197, doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4630-5
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1971
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 844
- 被引次数: 0