Effects of Tamarisk shrub on physicochemical properties of soil in coastal wetland of the Bohai Sea

HE Xiuping; WANG Baodong; XIE Linping; XIN Ming; WANG Wei; WANG Zicheng; ZHANG Wenquan; WEI Qinsheng

doi:10.1007/s13131-016-0851-8

柽柳对渤海滨海湿地土壤理化参数的影响

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0851-8

国家海洋局第一海洋研究所, 青岛, 266061

基金项目: The Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean under contract No. 201205008.

计量
- 文章访问数: 1060
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 922
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-24
- 修回日期: 2016-01-06

Effects of Tamarisk shrub on physicochemical properties of soil in coastal wetland of the Bohai Sea

First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Qingdao 266061, China

摘要

摘要: 目前针对柽柳对土壤理化性质有很多不同甚至相反的结论,为了探知柽柳对滨海湿地土壤理化参数的影响,我们针对渤海滨海湿地柽柳冠下土壤理化参数如盐度,pH和水分进行了为期一年的监测。与对照区域相比,在柽柳生长季节当降水量较少时,由于柽柳对水分的消耗,在其主根附近形成土壤水分含量低值区;然而,在柽柳生长期或柽柳生长停滞期,当降水量丰富时,由于柽柳根际的保水作用,在柽柳主根附近形成水分含量高值区。柽柳根际的吸收作用会暂时降低土壤盐分含量但最终会通过雨水对枝叶盐分的淋洗以及落叶将盐分返回土壤。柽柳冠下土壤水分年平均值较对照区仅低6.4%,这表明在温带滨海湿地年平均降雨适中的地区,柽柳对土壤干旱和保水作用并没有很大的影响。然而,柽柳冠下土壤年平均盐分较对照区高18%,表明柽柳确实具有增加其冠下土壤盐分含量的作用。此外,土壤pH值在夏季会低至7.3而在冬季高至10.2。在柽柳生长季节,柽柳主根附近的pH比对照区低1个多pH单位但是在生长停滞期却差别不大,表明柽柳确实能够降低滨海湿地土壤pH。
- 滨海湿地 /
- 柽柳 /
- 土壤 /
- 理化参数
Abstract: There are many different and even controversial results concerning the effects of Tamarisk on the physicochemical properties of soil. A year-round monitoring of soil salinity, pH and moisture is conducted beneath the Tamarisk shrub in a coastal wetland in the Bohai Sea in China, to ascertain the effects of Tamarisk on the physicochemical properties of soil in coastal wetland. Compared with the control area, the soil moisture content is lower around the area of the taproot when there is less precipitation in the growing season because of water consumption by Tamarisk shrub. However, the soil moisture content is higher around the taproot when there is more precipitation in the growing season or in the non-growing period because of water conservation by the rhizosphere. The absorption of salt by the Tamarisk shrub reduces the soil salinity temporarily, but eventually salt returns to the soil by the leaching of salt on leaves by rainfall or by fallen leaves. The annual average soil moisture content beneath the Tamarisk shrub is lower than the control area by only 6.4%, indicating that the Tamarisk shrub has little effect on drought or water conservation in soils in the temperate coastal wetland with moderate annual precipitation. The annual average salinity beneath the Tamarisk shrub is 18% greater than that of the control area, indicating that Tamarisk does have an effect of rising soil salinity around Tamarisk shrubs. The soil pH value is as low as 7.3 in summer and as high as 10.2 in winter. The pH of soil near the taproot of the Tamarisk shrubs is one pH unit lower than that in the control area during the growing season. The difference in pH is less different from the control area in the non-growing season, indicating that the Tamarisk shrub does have the effect of reducing the alkalinity of soil in coastal wetland.
- coastal wetland /
- Tamarisk /
- soil /
- physicochemical parameter

HTML全文

参考文献(36)

Bateman H L, Paxton E H. 2009. Saltcedar and Russian olive interactions with wildlife. In: Shafroth P B, Brown C A, Merritt D M, eds. Saltcedar and Russian olive Control Demonstration Act Science Assessment: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 5247: 49-63

Berry W L. 1970. Characteristics of salts secreted by Tamarix aphylla. American Journal of Botany, 57(10): 1226-1230

Brock J H. 1994. Tamarix spp. (salt cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western USA. In: de Waal L C, Child L E, Wade P M, et al., eds. Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 27-44

Busch D E, Smith S D. 1993. Effects of fire on water and salinity relations of riparian woody taxa. Oecologia, 94(2): 186-194

Campbell C J, Dick-Peddie W A. 1964. Comparison of phreatophyte communities on the Rio Grande in New Mexico. Ecology, 45(3): 492-502

Decker J P. 1961. Salt secretion by Tamarix pentandra pall. Forest Science, 7(3): 214-217

Di Tomaso J M. 1998. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technology, 12(2): 326-336

Everitt B L. 1980. Ecology of saltcedar—A plea for research. Environmental Geology, 3(2): 77-84

Everitt B L. 1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands, 18(4): 658-668

Gay L W, Fritschen L J. 1979. An energy budget analysis of water use by saltcedar. Water Resources Research, 15(6): 1589-1592

Glenn E, Tanner R, Mendez S, et al. 1998. Growth rates, salt tolerance and water use characteristics of native and invasive riparian plants from the delta of the Colorado River, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments, 40(3): 281-294

Grubb R T, Sheley R L, Carlstrom R D. 1997. Saltcedar (tamarisk). Bozeman: Montana State University Extension Service MT9710

Guan Hongbin, Wand Xiaolan, Ju Di. 2009. Soiled modification and application of Tamarix chinensis on the saline soil. Resource Development & Market (in Chinese), 25(10): 918-921

Hem J D. 1967. Composition of saline residues on leaves and stems of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pallas): Analyses of saline depos-its leached or washed from saltcedar plants. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang C X, et al. 2003. Origins of root-medi-ated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to en-vironmental constraints: a review. Plant and Soil, 248(1-2): 43-59

Horton J L, Clark J L. 2001. Water table decline alters growth and sur-vival of Salix gooddingii and Tamarix chinensis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 140(2-3): 239-247

Ladenburger C G, Hild A L, Kazmer D J, et al. 2006. Soil salinity pat-terns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. Journal of Arid Environments, 65(1): 111-128

Lesica P, DeLuca T H. 2004. Is tamarisk allelopathic?. Plant and Soil, 267(1-2): 357-365

Liu Chunjiang. 2006. The application of Tamarisk resources in the coastal shelter forest construction of the Yellow River delta ar-gillaceous. Protection Forest Science and Technology (in Chinese), (2): 42-43, 61

Merritt D M, Shafroth P B. 2012. Edaphic, salinity, and stand structur-al trends in chronosequences of native and non-native domin-ated riparian forests along the Colorado River, USA. Biological Invasions, 14(12): 2665-2685

Nagler P L, Glenn E P, Jarnevich C S, et al. 2011. Distribution and abundance of saltcedar and Russian olive in the western United States. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(6): 508-523

Robinson T W. 1965. Introduction, Spread, and Aerial Extent of Salt-cedar (Tarmarix) in the Western States: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Papers, 491-A, 12

Sexton J P. 2000. Invasive potential of Tamarix ramosissima (saltce-dar) in continental climates of North America [dissertation]. Missoula, MT, USA: University of Montana

Shafroth P B, Friedman J M, Ischinger L S. 1995. Effects of salinity on establishment of Populus fremontii (cottonwood) and Tamarix ramosissima (saltcedar) in southwestern United States. Great Basin Naturalist, 55(1): 58-65

Smith S D, Devitt D A, Sala A, et al. 1998. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands, 18(4): 687-696

Stromberg J C. 1998. Functional equivalency of saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and fremont cottonwood (Populus fremonth) along a free-flowing river. Wetlands, 18(4): 675-686

Stromberg J C, Chew M K, Nagler P L, et al. 2009. Changing percep-tions of change: the role of scientists in Tamarix and river man-agement. Restoration Ecology, 17(2): 177-186

Thomson W W, Berry W L, Liu L L. 1969. Localization and secretion of salt by the salt glands of Tamarix aphylla. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 63(2): 310-317

Titus J H, Nowak R S, Smith S D. 2002. Soil resource heterogeneity in the Mojave Desert. Journal of Arid Environments, 52(3): 269-292

Vandersande M W, Glenn E P, Walworth J L. 2001. Tolerance of five riparian plants from the lower Colorado River to salinity drought and inundation. Journal of Arid Environments, 49(1): 147-159

Waisel Y. 1991. The glands of Tamarix aphylla: a system for salt recretion or for carbon concentration. Physiologia Plantarum, 83(3):506-510

Wang Yulong, Li Zhige, Zhang Feng, et al. 2004. Research on soil profile beneath Tamarisk forest. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design (in Chinese), 27(S1): 71-72

Wang Yuzhen, Liu Yongxin, Wei Chunlan, et al. 2006. Improvement of salt-affected soils with six halophytes. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences (in Chinese), 34(5): 951-952, 957

Wang Liyan, Pan Jie, Xiao Hui, et al. 2012. Effect of planting salt-tolerant plants on water-soluble salt in coastal saline soil. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (in Chinese), 28(20): 250-254

Wang Zhenyu, Zhao Fangfang, Zhang Baoguo, et al. 2010. Rhizosphere effect of three halophytes in the Yellow River Delta on nitrogen and phosphorus. Environmental Science & Technology(in Chinese), 33(10): 33-38

Yi Liangpeng, Ma Jian, Li Yan. 2007. Soil salt and nutrient concentration in the rhizosphere of desert halophytes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(9): 3565-3571

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1060
HTML全文浏览量: 42
PDF下载量: 922
被引次数: 0

柽柳对渤海滨海湿地土壤理化参数的影响

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0851-8

计量

出版历程

Effects of Tamarisk shrub on physicochemical properties of soil in coastal wetland of the Bohai Sea

计量

出版历程

目录