Numerical analysis of submarine landslides using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics depth integral model

WANG Zhongtao; LI Xinzhong; LIU Peng; TAO Yanqi

doi:10.1007/s13131-016-0864-3

基于SPH深度积分模型的海底滑坡数值分析

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0864-3

1.
大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室, 大连, 116023
2.
中海油研究总院, 北京, 100081

基金项目: The Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under contract No. 20120041130002; the National Key Project of Science and Technology under contract No. 2011ZX 05056-001-02; the Fundamental Research Funds for the C_entral Universities under contract No. DUT14ZD220.

计量
- 文章访问数: 1338
- HTML全文浏览量: 67
- PDF下载量: 960
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-29
- 修回日期: 2015-08-14

Numerical analysis of submarine landslides using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics depth integral model

1.
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
2.
General Research Institute of China National Offshore Oil Corporation, Beijing 100010, China

摘要

摘要: 海底滑坡会对海洋工程结构物造成严重破坏。滑移速度和距离是量化和分析海底滑坡的两个重要参数。目前BING等计算方法在模拟水下土体流动方面存在局限性,因此通过建立考虑土体固结和侵蚀效应的控制方程,选用摩擦流变模型,采用SPH深度积分算法,对海底滑坡进行了模拟研究。对比不同水深、坡度、接触摩擦系数和侵蚀率条件下的滑移体的速度、高度、长度的时程曲线,整理了最大滑移距离和速度,讨论变化规律。研究成果可为海底滑坡灾害预警和海底管线路由选址提供技术参考。
- 滑移速度 /
- 滑移距离 /
- SPH深度积分法 /
- 摩擦流变模型 /
- 侵蚀效应
Abstract: Submarine landslides can cause severe damage to marine engineering structures. Their sliding velocity and runout distance are two major parameters for quantifying and analyzing the risk of submarine landslides. Currently, commercial calculation programs such as BING have limitations in simulating underwater soil movements. All of these processes can be consistently simulated through a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) depth integrated model. The basis of the model is a control equation that was developed to take into account the effects of soil consolidation and erosion. In this work, the frictional rheological mode has been used to perform a simulation study of submarine landslides. Time-history curves of the sliding body's velocity, height, and length under various conditions of water depth, slope gradient, contact friction coefficient, and erosion rate are compared; the maximum sliding distance and velocity are calculated; and patterns of variation are discussed. The findings of this study can provide a reference for disaster warnings and pipeline route selection.
- sliding velocity /
- runout distance /
- smoothed particle hydrodynamics depth integral method /
- frictional rheological model /
- erosion effect

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

Arimoto S, Murakami A. 2002. Characteristics of localized behavior of saturated soil by EFG. In: Proceedings of 1st International Workshop on New Frontiers in Computational Geomechanics. Banff: World Scientific, 169-172

Baxter G W, Behringer R P. 1990. Cellular automata models of granu-lar flow. Physical Review A, 42(2): 1017-1020

Blanc T. 2008. Numerical simulation of debris flows with the 2D SPH depth-integrated model [dissertation]. Vienna: University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences

Bruschi R, Bughi S, Spinazzè M, et al. 2006. Impact of debris flows and turbidity currents on seafloor structures. Norwegian Journ-al of Geology, 86(3): 317-337

Canals M, Lastras G, Urgeles R, et al. 2004. Slope failure dynamics and impacts from seafloor and shallow sub-seafloor geophysic-al data: case studies from the COSTA project. Marine Geology, 213(1-4): 9-72

De Blasio F V, Engvik L, Harbitz C B, et al. 2004. Hydroplaning and submarine debris flows. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(C1): C01002

Gauer P, Elverh.i A, Issler D, et al. 2006. On numerical simulations of subaqueous slides: back-calculations of laboratory experi-ments of clay-rich slides. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 86(3): 295-300

Gue C S. 2012. Submarine landslide flows simulation through centri-fuge modelling [dissertation]. Cambridge: University of Cam-bridge

Hao Minghui, Xu Qiang, Yang Lei, et al. 2014. Physical modeling and movement mechanism of landslide-debris avalanches. Rock and Soil Mechanics (in Chinese), 35(S1): 127-132

Harbitz C B, Parker G, Elverh.i A, et al. 2003. Hydroplaning of sub-aqueous debris flows and glide blocks: analytical solutions and discussion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B7): 2349

Hu Guanghai. 2011. Identification of submarine landslides along the continental slope of the east china sea and analysis of factors causing submarine landslides (in Chinese) [dissertation]. Qing-dao: Ocean University of China

Huang Yu, Hao Liang, Xie Pan, et al. 2009. Numerical simulation of large deformation of soil flow based on SPH method. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (in Chinese), 31(10): 1520-1524

Imran J, Harff P, Parker G. 2001. A numerical model of submarine debris flow with graphical user interface. Computers & Geoscience, 27(6): 717-729

Kulikov E A, Rabinovich A B, Thomson R E, et al. 1996. The landslide tsunami of November 3, 1994, Skagway Harbor, Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(3): 6609-6615

Li Jiagang, Xiu Zongxiang, Shen Hong, et al. 2012. A review of the studies on submarine mass movement. Coastal Engineering (in Chinese), 31(4): 67-78

Locat J, Lee H J. 2002. Submarine landslides: advances and chal-lenges. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1): 193-212

McDougall S, Hungr O. 2005. Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42(5): 1437-1448

Monaghan J J, Gingold R A. 1983. Shock simulation by the particle method SPH. Journal of Computational Physics, 52(2): 374-389

Pastor M, Blanc T, Haddad B, et al. 2014. Application of a SPH depth-integrated model to landslide run-out analysis. Landslides, 11(5): 793-812

Pastor M, Blanc T, Pastor M J. 2009a. A depth-integrated viscoplastic model for dilatant saturated cohesive-frictional fluidized mix-tures: application to fast catastrophic landslides. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 158(1-3): 142-153

Pastor M, Haddad B, Sorbino G, et al. 2009b. A depth-integrated, coupled SPH model for flow-like landslides and related phe-nomena. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 33(2): 143-172

Pastor M, Quecedo M, González E, et al. 2004. A simple approxima-tion to bottom friction for Bingham fluid depth integrated mod-els. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(2): 149-155

Piper D J W, Cochonat P, Morrison M L. 1999. The sequence of events around the epicenter of the 1929 Grand Banks earthquake: ini-tiation of debris flows and turbidity current inferred from sides-can sonar. Sedimentology, 46(1): 79-97

Pirulli M, Pastor M. 2012. Numerical study on the entrainment of bed material into rapid landslides. Géotechnique, 62(11): 959-972

Sasaki T, Ohnishi Y, Yohinaka R. 1994. Discontinuous deformation analysis and its application to rock mechanics problems. Journ-al of JSCE, 1994(493): 11-20

Saxov S. 1990. Marine slides-some introductory remarks. Marine Geotechnology, 9: 110-114

Shen Tong, Wang Yunsheng, Wu Longke. 2014. Discrete element simulation analysis of formation mechanism of Xiaonanhai landslide in Chongqing City. Rock and Soil Mechanics (in Chinese), 35(S2): 667-675

Zakeri A, H.eg K, Nadim F. 2009. Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines-Part Ⅱ: numerical analysis. Coastal Engineering, 56(1): 1-10

Zhu Lin. 2013. The study on the characteristics of hazardous geology at the pipeline routing area of Liwan 3-1 gas field in the north-ern South China Sea (in Chinese) [dissertation]. Qingdao: The First Institute Of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 1338
HTML全文浏览量: 67
PDF下载量: 960
被引次数: 0

基于SPH深度积分模型的海底滑坡数值分析

doi: 10.1007/s13131-016-0864-3

计量

出版历程

Numerical analysis of submarine landslides using a smoothed particle hydrodynamics depth integral model

计量

出版历程

目录