WindSat satellite comparisons with nearshore buoy wind data near the U.S. west and east coasts
-
摘要: 利用美国近海岸2004-2014年的固定浮标数据,本文对比分析了WindSat的近海岸风速产品。匹配时空窗口分别为30分钟和25公里。对比分析结果表明:WindSat反演的美国近海岸风速产品的均方根误差优于1.44 m/s,并且东海岸风速反演结果优于西海岸。WindSat下降轨道的风速反演结果优于上升轨道的结果。通过浮标相互间的对比分析发现,WindSat近海岸的风速反演结果与近岸海水深度、经度及距岸距离等因素并无明显的相关性。此外,利用2007-2008年的固定浮标数据,本文还对比分析了WindSat和QuikSCAT的近海岸风速反演结果,结果表明:相对于浮标数据,WindSat的风速反演值偏低,而QuikSCAT的风速反演值偏高;总体上来看,WindSat的近岸风速反演结果略优于QuikSCAT的近海岸风速反演结果。以上风速反演的精度均达到了传感器设定的指标,其为进一步的科学研究提供了良好的数据支撑。Abstract: Nearshore wind speeds retrieved by WindSat are validated by a comparison with the moored buoy observations near the U.S. west and east coasts. A 30 min and 25 km collection window is used for the WindSat wind data and buoy measurements from January 2004 to December 2014. Comparisons show that the overall root-mean-square error is better than 1.44 m/s near the U.S. coasts, and the result for the east coast is better than that for the west coast. The retrieval accuracy of the descending portions is slightly better than that of the ascending portions. Most buoy-to-buoy variations are not significantly correlated with the coastal topography, the longitude and the distance from the shore or satellite-buoy separation distance. In addition, comparisons between a polarimetric microwave radiometer and a microwave scatterometer are accomplished with the nearshore buoy observations from 2007 to 2008. The WindSat-derived winds tend to be lower than the buoy observations near the U.S. coasts. In contrast, the QuikSCAT-derived winds tend to be higher than the buoy observations. Overall, the retrieval accuracy of WindSat is slightly better than that of QuikSCAT, and these satellite-derived winds are sufficiently accurate for scientific studies.
-
Key words:
- WindSat /
- polarimetric microwave radiometer /
- nearshore wind /
- validation
-
Adams I S, Hennon C C, Jones W L, et al. 2006. Evaluation of hur-ricane ocean vector winds from WindSat. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(3):656-667 Atlas R, Reale O, Ardizzone J, et al. 2006. Geophysical validation of WindSat surface wind data and its impact on numerical weath-er prediction. In:Proceedings of SPIE Atmospheric and Envir-onmental Remote Sensing Data Processing and Utilization:Ⅱ. Perspective on Calibration/Validation Initiatives and Strategies. SPIE, San Diego, California, USA, 6301:63010C Bormann N, Kelly G, Bauer P, et al. 2006. Assimilation and monitor-ing of SSMIS, AMSR-E and TMI data at ECMWF. In:Proceed-ings of the 15th International TOVS Study Conference. Maratea, Italy. USA:University of Wisconsin-Madison. http://library. ssec.wisc.edu/research_Resources/publications/pdfs/ITSC15/bormann01_ITSC15_2006.pdf Deblonde G, Yu W, Garand L, et al. 1997. Evaluation of global numer-ical weather prediction analyses and forecasts using DMSP spe-cial sensor microwave imager retrievals:2. Analyses/forecasts intercomparison with SSM/I retrievals. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans (1978-2012), 102(D2):1851-1866 Dorman C E, Winant C D. 1995. Buoy observations of the atmo-sphere along the west coast of the United States, 1981-1990. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans (1978-2012), 100(C8):16029-16044 Freilich M H, Vanhoff B A. 2006. The accuracy of preliminary Wind-Sat vector wind measurements:comparisons with NDBC buoys and QuikSCAT. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(3):622-637 Gaiser P W, St Germain K M, Twarog E M, et al. 2004. The WindSat spaceborne polarimetric microwave radiometer:sensor de-scription and early orbit performance. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(11):2347-2361 Gilhousen D B. 1987. A field evaluation of NDBC moored buoy winds. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 4(1):94-104 Huang Xiaoqi, Zhu Jianhua, Lin Mingsen, et al. 2014. A preliminary assessment of the sea surface wind speed production of HY-2 scanning microwave radiometer. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 33(1):114-119 Mears C A, Smith D K, Wentz F J. 2001. Comparison of special sensor microwave imager and buoy-measured wind speeds from 1987 to 1997. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans (1978-2012), 106(C6):11719-11729 Meissner T, Wentz F J. 2005. Ocean retrievals for WindSat:radiative transfer model, algorithm, validation. In:Proceedings of MTS/IEEE OCEANS. Washington, DC, USA, doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639750 Meissner T, Wentz F J. 2009. Wind-vector retrievals under rain with passive satellite microwave radiometers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(9):3065-3083 Pickett M H, Tang Wenqing, Rosenfeld L K, et al. 2003. QuikSCAT satellite comparisons with nearshore buoy wind data off the U.S. west coast. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Techno-logy, 20(12):1869-1879 Ricciardulli L, Wentz F. 2011. Reprocessed QuikSCAT (V04) wind vec-tors with Ku-2011 geophysical model function. Remote Sens-ing Systems Technical Report 043011. USA:Remote Sensing Systems.http://images.remss.com/qscat/qscat_Ku2011_tech_report.pdf Wang He, Zhu Jianhua, Lin Mingsen, et al. 2013. First six months quality assessment of HY-2A SCAT wind products using in situ measurements. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 32(11):27-33 Wentz F J, Meissner T, Smith D K. 2005. Assessment of the initial re-lease of WindSat wind retrievals. RSS Technical Report 010605. USA:Remote Sensing Systems.http://images.remss.com/pa-pers/windsat/Assessment_of_the_Initial_Release_of_WindSat_Wind_Retrievals.doc Yu Lisan, Jin Xiangze. 2012. Buoy perspective of a high-resolution global ocean vector wind analysis constructed from passive ra-diometers and active scatterometers (1987-present). Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans (1978-2012),117(C11):C11013
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1068
- HTML全文浏览量: 44
- PDF下载量: 911
- 被引次数: 0