Deep learning classification of coastal wetland hyperspectral image combined spectra and texture features: A case study of Huanghe (Yellow) River Estuary wetland
-
摘要: 本文基于CHRIS高光谱遥感影像,发展了一种结合地物光谱特征和多纹理空间特征信息,采用双全链接的8层深度卷积神经网络分类算法对滨海湿地高光谱影像进行遥感地物分类,并在黄河口滨海湿地进行了应用。结果表明:1)基于测试样本数据,联合光谱特征和K-L变换的纹理特征信息,采用DCNN模型方法展现了高的分类精度,精度高达99%;2)利用光谱特征和全纹理特征的精度比仅使用光谱特征和光谱特征联合K-L变换后纹理特征的分类精度低。利用K-L变换后的光谱特征和纹理特征的DCNN分类精度达到99.38%,相比于使用全纹理特征信息的精度提高了4.15%;3)基于验证图像,发展的DCNN分类方法精度优于其他算法,DCNN方法总体分类精度为84.64%,Kappa系数为0.80;4)相比于浅层分类方法,本文发展的DCNN模型分类算法保证了所有地物类型的分类精度更加均衡,保持了主要地物类型的分类精度几乎不变,同时提高了滩涂和农田的精度。基于DCNN模型,潮滩和农田的分类精度分别达到79.26%和56.72%。比其它浅层分类方法提高了2.51%和10.6%。Abstract: This paper develops a deep learning classification method with fully-connected 8-layers characteristics to classification of coastal wetland based on CHRIS hyperspectral image. The method combined spectral feature and multi-spatial texture feature information has been applied in the Huanghe (Yellow) River Estuary coastal wetland. The results show that:(1) Based on testing samples, the DCNN model combined spectral feature and texture feature after K-L transformation appear high classification accuracy, which is up to 99%. (2) The accuracy by using spectral feature with all the texture feature is lower than that using spectral only and combing spectral and texture feature after K-L transformation. The DCNN classification accuracy using spectral feature and texture feature after K-L transformation was up to 99.38%, and the outperformed that of all the texture feature by 4.15%. (3) The classification accuracy of the DCNN method achieves better performance than other methods based on the whole validation image, with an overall accuracy of 84.64% and the Kappa coefficient of 0.80. (4) The developed DCNN model classification algorithm ensured the accuracy of all types is more balanced, and it also greatly improved the accuracy of tidal flat and farmland, while kept the classification accuracy of main types almost invariant compared to the shallow algorithms. The classification accuracy of tidal flat and farmland is up to 79.26% and 56.72% respectively based on the DCNN model. And it improves by about 2.51% and 10.6% compared with that of the other shallow classification methods.
-
Key words:
- coastal wetland /
- hyperspectral image /
- deep learning /
- classification
-
An Ni, Ma Yi, Bao Yuhai. 2016. Spectral fidelity analysis of scaling transformation of hyperspectral remote sensing image based on empirical mode decomposition. Remote Sensing Technology and Application (in Chinese), 31(2):230-238 Cao Linlin, Li Haitao, Han Yanshun, et al. 2016. Application of convolutional neural networks in classification of high resolution remote sensing imagery. Science of Surveying and Mapping (in Chinese), 41(9):170-175 Chen Yushi, Lin Zhouhan, Zhao Xing, et al. 2017. Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7(6):2094-2107 Chubey M S, Franklin S E, Wulder M A. 2006. Object-based analysis of ikonos-2 imagery for extraction of forest inventory parameters. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 72(4):383-394 Farabet C, Couprie C, Najman L, et al. 2013. Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35(8):1915-1929, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.231 Freund Y. 1995. Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and Computation, 121(2):256-285, doi: 10.1006/inco.1995.1136 He Y, Qian D, Ben M. 2010. Decision fusion on supervised and unsupervised classifiers for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7(4):875-879 Hinton G, Deng Li, Yu Dong, et al. 2012. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition:the shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6):82-97, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 Hinton G E, Osindero S, Teh Y W. 2014. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18(7):1527-1554 Hinton G E, Salakhutdinov R R. 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786):504-507, doi: 10.1126/science.1127647 Hu Wei, Huang Yangyu, Wei Li, et al. 2015. Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. Journal of Sensors, 2015:258619 Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In:Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe, Nevada:Curran Associates Inc, 1097-1105 Lee H, Kwon H. 2016. Contextual deep CNN based hyperspectral classification. In:Proceedings of 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing, China:IEEE Li Wei, Prasad S, Fowler J E, et al. 2012. Locality-preserving dimensionality reduction and classification for hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(4):1185-1198, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2165957 Li Xiaomin, Zhang Jie, Ma Yi, et al. 2015. Research on the classification method of the hyper-spectral image based on principal component analysis and decision level fusion. Marine Sciences, 39(2):25-34 Licciardi G, Pacifici F, Tuia D, et al. 2009. Decision fusion for the classification of hyperspectral data:outcome of the 2008 GRS-S data fusion contest. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(11):3857-3865, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2029340 Mei Shaohui, Ji Jingyu, Bi Qianqian, et al. 2016. Integrating spectral and spatial information into deep convolutional Neural Networks for hyperspectral classification. In:Proceedings of 2016 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing, China:IEEE, 5067-5070 Melgani F, Bruzzone L. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8):1778-1790, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865 Slavkovikj V, Verstockt S, De Neve W, et al. 2015. Hyperspectral image classification with convolutional neural networks. In:Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. Brisbane, Australia:ACM, 1159-1162 Sun Junjie, Ma Daxi, Ren Chunying, et al. 2013. Method of extraction of wetlands' information in nanweng river basin based on multi-temporal environment satellite images. Wetland Science (in Chinese), 11(1):60-67 Tarabalka Y, Benediktsson J A, Chanussot J. 2009. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral imagery based on partitional clustering techniques. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(8):2973-2987, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2016214 Teoh S S, Bräunl T. 2012. Symmetry-based monocular vehicle detection system. Machine Vision and Applications, 23(5):831-842, doi: 10.1007/s00138-011-0355-7 Tian Zhuangzhuang, Zhan Ronghui, Hu Jiemin, et al. 2016. SAR ATR based on convolutional neural network. Journal of Radars (in Chinese), 5(3):320-325 Waibel A, Hanazawa T, Hinton G E, et al. 1989. Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 37(3):328-339, doi: 10.1109/29.21701 Xu Yingxue, Shao Jingli, Yang Wenfeng, et al. 2006. Research on classification and change of seaside wetland around Yalujiang river estuary based on RS and GIS. Geoscience (in Chinese), 20(3):500-504 Xu Zhenlei, Yang Rui, Wang Xinchun, et al. 2016. Based on leaves convolutional neural network recognition algorithm. Computer Knowledge and Technology (in Chinese), 12(10):194-196 Yang Jingxiang, Zhao Yongqiang, Chan J C W, et al. 2016. Hyperspectral image classification using two-channel deep convolutional neural network. In:Proceedings of 2016 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Beijing, China:IEEE, 5079-5082 Yue Jun, Zhao Wenzhi, Mao Shanjun, et al. 2015. Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images using deep convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing Letters, 6(6):468-477, doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1047045
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 590
- HTML全文浏览量: 70
- PDF下载量: 395
- 被引次数: 0