HAN Lei. An error evaluation on the vertical velocity algorithm in POM[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2014, 33(7): 12-20. doi: 10.1007/s13131-014-0505-7
Citation: HAN Lei. An error evaluation on the vertical velocity algorithm in POM[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2014, 33(7): 12-20. doi: 10.1007/s13131-014-0505-7

An error evaluation on the vertical velocity algorithm in POM

doi: 10.1007/s13131-014-0505-7
  • Received Date: 2013-01-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-11-26
  • A time splitting technique is common to many free surface ocean models. The different truncation errors in the equations of the internal and external modes require a numerical adjustment to make sure that algorithms correctly satisfy continuity equations and conserve tracers quantities. The princeton ocean model (POM) has applied a simple method of adjusting the vertical mean of internal velocities to external velocities at each internal time step. However, due to the Asselin time filter method adopted to prevent the numerical instability, the method of velocity adjustment used in POM can no longer guarantee the satisfaction of the continuity equation in the internal mode, though a special treatment is used to relate the surface elevation of the internal mode with that of the external mode. The error is proved to be a second-order term of the coefficient in the Asselin filter. One influence of this error in the numerical model is the failure of the kinetic boundary condition at the sea floor. By a regional experiment and a quasi-global experiment, the magnitudes of this error are evaluated, and several sensitivity tests of this error are performed. The characteristic of this error is analyzed and two alternative algorithms are suggested to reduce the error.
  • loading
  • Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. 1967. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM Journal, 3: 215-234
    Da Silva A, Young C, Levitus S. 1994. Atlas of Surface Marine Data 1994, vol. 1, Algorithms and Procedures. Washington D C, US: Dep of Commer, 74
    Ezer T, Arango H, Shchepetkin A F. 2002. Developments in terrainfollowing ocean models: intercomparison of numerical aspects. Ocean Modell, 4: 249-267
    Higdon R L, Bennett A F. 1996. Modeling, stability analysis of operator for large-scale ocean modeling. J Comput Phys, 123: 311-329
    Higdon R L, de Szoeke R A. 1997. Barotropic-baroclinic time splitting for ocean circulation modeling. J Comput Phys, 135: 31-53
    Kantha L H, Clayson C A. 2000. Numerical Models of Oceans and Oceanic Processes. San Diego: Academic Press, 750
    Mellor G L. 2003. Users Guide for a Three-dimensional, Primitive Equation, Numerical Ocean Model. June 2003 version. Princeton: Princeton University, 56
    Munk W. 1966. Abyssal recipes. Deep-Sea Res, 13: 707-730
    Shchepetkin A F, McWilliams J C. 2005. The regional ocean modeling system: A split-explicit, free-surface, topography following coordinates ocean model. Ocean Modell, 9: 347-404
    Wunsch C, Ferrari R. 2004. Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 36: 281-314
    Xia Changshui, Qiao Fangli, Yang Yongzeng, et al. 2006. Threedimensional structure of the summertime circulation in the Yellow Sea from a wave-tide-circulation coupled model. J Geophys Res, 111: C11S-C13S
    Xia Changshui, Qiao Fangli, Zhang Qinghua, et al. 2004. Numerical modeling of the quasi-global ocean circulation based on POM. J Hydrodyn: Ser B, 16: 537-543
    Zhou Weidong. 2002. A proper time integration with split stepping for the explicit free-surface modeling. Adv Atmos Sci, 19: 255-265
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1440) PDF downloads(1488) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return