
Citation: | Xiuxia MU, Chi ZHANG, Ying XUE, Chongliang ZHANG, Binduo XU, Yiping REN. Fishery biology of whitespotted conger Conger myriaster (Brevoort, 1856) in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019, 38(6): 18-24. doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1271-8 |
Whitespotted conger Conger myriaster is one of the most valuable fishery species in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea and the seas around Korean Peninsula and Japan (Yamada, 1986; Tokimura, 2001). There is a wide range of distribution of C. myriaster in China, from the estuary of Yalu River to Shacheng Harbor of Fujian Province of China (Zhang, 2010), and the annual commercial catch reach over 13 000 t in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (local fishery statistics), according to the records of commercial catches in recent years. However, the population size of this species appears to fluctuate substantially, which draws increasing concerns in local fishery communities.
Most literatures of C. myriaster were conducted in Japanese and South Korea’s waters, aiming to reveal early life history characteristics (Kimura et al., 2004; Yagi et al., 2010), spatial distribution (Okamura et al., 2000; Katayama et al., 2004; Harada et al., 2006), and growth and reproduction characteristics (Huh and Kwak, 1988; Utoh et al., 2003, 2004; Choi et al., 2008; Gorie et al., 2010; Kawazu et al., 2015). It should be noted that the coastal waters of China actually serve as an important feeding ground for congers (Chen, 1991), and the decline of C. myriaster in China seas may affect the recruitment of the whole species. However, the distribution and fishery biology of conger have been rarely studied in China seas, and the biological characteristics of the local population is less well understood. The biological information and distribution of C. myriaster were briefly reported in the 1970s and 1980s in the East China Sea (Zhang et al., 1977; Tang and Wu, 1988), whereas the research interest have largely changed in recent years, focusing on the size selectivity of eel pot (Tang et al., 2010) and feeding habits (Zhang and Tang, 2003; Liu et al., 2015). The up-to-date biological information of C. myriaster in the Chinese waters is desired not only for the fishery management in China but also for the sustainability of the total population.
Based on the fishery surveys of C. myriaster conducted by bottom trawl in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea form 2016 to 2017, the present study analyzed the biological characteristics of C. myriaster. We provide critical and updated information for the growth, maturity, and feeding characteristics of this species. In addition, we compared the biological characteristics of C. myriaster to their history records as well as to the studies in Japan and Korea, in order to examine the spatial and temporal variation in the biology of the species. This study aims to improve the understanding of the biology of C. myriaster in China seas.
The conger specimens were collected using a bottom trawl in three survey areas located in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea (Fig. 1). A total of 529 specimens were included in this study, mostly coming from the central Yellow Sea (Table 1). Specimens sampling in October 2016 and January 2017 were conducted with the trawl net of 15 m width and cod end mesh size of 20 mm, and samples from other time were collected by local commercial bottom trawls with cod end mesh size of 24 mm.
Sample area | Survey time | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm |
Central Yellow Sea | Oct. 2016 | 237 | 132–575 | 317±129 |
Jan. 2017 | 94 | 195–440 | 252±45 | |
Apr. 2017 | 41 | 158–632 | 417±97 | |
Southern Yellow Sea | Feb. 2017 | 13 | 395–770 | 631±125 |
Apr. 2017 | 25 | 140–749 | 424 ±132 | |
East China Sea | Feb. 2017 | 18 | 241–726 | 587±129 |
Mar. 2017 | 28 | 492–785 | 547±86 | |
Apr. 2017 | 73 | 457–834 | 583±97 |
We measured the body size of conger. Total length (TL, mm), pre-anal length (AL, mm), body weight (BW, g), net weight (NW, g), stomach wet weight (g) and gonad weight (g) for each specimen were recorded. The relationship between total length and weight was described by Eq. (1) (Ricker, 1975):
$$ W = a{L^b}, $$ | (1) |
where W is the body weight and L is the total length. The parameter a represents the condition factor and b is the growth exponential coefficient. Logarithm transformation was applied to the equation, and the parameters a and b were estimated using the linear least squares method (Ricker, 1975). The hypothesis of isometric growth was tested against b=3 using t-test.
Sagittal otoliths were dissected through the gills for age determination by examining burn otoliths under UV light (Katayama et al., 2002). Estimates of age were determined by rings within the sectioned otoliths (Fig. 2). Individuals were divided into Groups according to the results of age determination (e.g., age Group 1 for the individuals of age one). A total of 255 specimens were used for aging, in which the right otolith was heated at 200°C for 5–10 min, then embedded in epoxy resin (EpoThin, Buehler) and sectioned along the dorsal-ventral axis across the core with a diamond circular saw (Isomet low speed, Buehler). The sections (0.3 mm) were mounted on glass slides and polished with 800–1 200 grit grinding paper (Minimet 1000 grinder-polisher, Buehler). Ages were randomly read twice with an interval of half month, and conflicting results were judged by a well-experienced reader with fish size information.
Growth was presented by the von-Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) Eq. (2) (Von Bertalanffy, 1951; Pauly, 1981):
$$ {L_t} = {L_\infty }\left({1 - {{\rm{e}}^{ - k\left({t - {t_0}} \right)}}} \right), $$ | (2) |
where Lt is the total length at age t, L∞ is the asymptotic total length, k is the growth coefficient, and t0 is the hypothetical age at zero length. Growth model was implemented using the packages FSA in R 3.3.3 (Ogle, 2016).
Gonads were fixed in 4% formalin and preserved in 70% ethanol for determination of sex and developmental stage. Gonad somatic index (GSI) values (%) were calculated by Eq. (3):
$$ {\rm{GSI = gonad\ wet\ weight/net\ weight}} \times {\rm{100}}{\rm{.}} $$ | (3) |
There were 99 specimens from the South Yellow Sea and East China Sea used to identify the gonad development stages. Each gonad was embedded in paraffin and stiffened as a block. The paraffin block was then sectioned (7–8 μm thickness) with a rotary microtome (LEICA RM 2155, Leica Microsystems Nussloch GmbH), stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin, and examined by optical microscope (ECLIPSE E600, Nikon Corporation). Oocyte development of the C. myriaster are divided into eight stages: chromatin nucleolus stage, peri-nucleolus stage, oil droplet stage, primary yolk globule stage, secondary yolk globule stage, tertiary yolk globule stage, migratory nucleus stage, and maturation stage (Utoh et al., 2003). Spermatogenesis of the C. myriaster could be divided into seven stages: early spermatogonial proliferation stage, late spermatogonial proliferation stage, early meiotic stage, mid meiotic stage, late meiotic stage, maturation stage, functional maturation stage, and spent stage (Utoh et al., 2004). Sex and gonad developmental stages were determined with tissue structures according previous studies (Utoh et al., 2003, 2004).
The stomachs were frozen before analyses. A total of 452 samples were used for stomach content analysis. The stomach contents were identified and sorted into major food items with stereoscopic microscope. The main prey taxa were classified into five categories: fish, crustacean, cephalopoda, polychaeta and others. The number and wet weight of each prey category were measured.
The TL of C. myriaster ranged from 132 to 834 mm with a mean of 431 mm (SD=191 mm), and AL ranged from 56 to 321 mm with a mean of 167 mm (SD=191 mm). The BW ranged from 6.0 to 1 121.2 g with a mean of (211.7±248.0) g. The relationship between TL and BW for individuals was: BW=1.74×10–7TL3.35 (N=529, R2=0.99). The t-test suggested that C. myriaster showed positive allometric growth (p<0.01).
Otoliths reading showed six age groups from 1 to 6 years, and the age Group 2 was the dominant group, which accounted for 35.91% of the total collected individuals, followed by age Group 1. Individuals of 1 and 2 years old were mainly from the coastal waters of the central Yellow Sea. Individuals of 3 years old were mainly found in the South Yellow Sea, East China Sea and offshore water of the central Yellow Sea. Individuals of 4 and 5 years old were mainly from the South Yellow Sea and East China Sea. A few 6 age individuals were sampled in the East China Sea (Fig. 3).
There was a wide variation in TL and BW within the same age class (Table 2). The mean total length at age was described by the von Bertalanffy equation: Lt=1 026×(1–e–0.226×(t+0.031 5)), in which L∞, t0 and k were estimated as 1 026 mm, –0.031 5 and 0.226, respectively.
Age | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm | AL range/mm | Mean AL±SD/mm | BW range/g | Mean BW±SD/g |
1 | 59 | 176–359 | 241±31 | 56–137 | 91±13 | 6.0–64.3 | 18.6±8.9 |
2 | 84 | 193–493 | 336±52 | 88–189 | 129±21 | 14.5–190.3 | 55.7±31.5 |
3 | 36 | 322–764 | 497±102 | 124–333 | 206±47 | 50.8–645.9 | 257.2±152.0 |
4 | 43 | 447–787 | 643±74 | 173–294 | 252±27 | 127.9–915.5 | 473.8±156.2 |
5 | 30 | 572–834 | 700±64 | 230–321 | 270±22 | 335.8–112 1.2 | 580.5±184.8 |
6 | 3 | 643–745 | 711±59 | 261–290 | 277±15 | 370.1–755.6 | 596.8±201.6 |
Total | 255 | 176–834 | 436±183 |
The sex ratio of conger was 2.67:1 (female: male) in the South Yellow Sea and 88:0 in the East China Sea. The development stage of ovary ranged from peri-nucleolus stage to secondary yolk globule stage, while testis of two males was at mid-meiotic stage (Fig. 4). Pre-vitellogenesis females, primary yolk globule stage females and mid-meiosis males were collected in the South Yellow Sea, and secondary yolk globule stage females were all collected in the East China Sea in April 2017.
Conger myriaster began maturation at 3 years old in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, and the AL of the mid-vitellogenesis females (primary yolk globule stage to the second yolk globule stage) was longer than 200 mm (Table 3). Mean GSI value were 1.22% for pre-vitellogenesis females (peri-nucleolus stage to oil droplet stage), 5.86% for mid-vitellogenesis females, and 0.41% for mid-meiotic male. The mean GSI value of C. myriaster increased with pre-anal length and time during the survey period from 24 February to 30 April (Fig. 5).
Gonad development stage | Age | AL range/mm | Mean AL/mm | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD | GSI range/% | Mean GSI±SD/% | Number of specimens |
Peri-nucleolus stage | 2–3 | 146–169 | 158±16 | 401–431 | 416±20 | 0.49–0.62 | 0.55±0.42 | 3 |
Oil droplet stage | 3 | 174–190 | 181±8 | 462–504 | 481±67 | 1.79–1.96 | 1.89±0.25 | 3 |
Primary yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 200–295 | 256±22 | 545–751 | 678±72 | 1.87–8.01 | 5.17±1.41 | 64 |
Second yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 243–321 | 271 ±19 | 560–834 | 682±76 | 4.53–13.11 | 7.55±2.13 | 26 |
Mid-meiotic stage | 3 | 145–151 | 148±3 | 391–401 | 396±7 | 0.39–0.42 | 0.41±0.37 | 3 |
Conger myriaster fed upon 65 prey species in our samples (Table 4), and fish and crustaceans were the main prey groups, accounting for 70.66% and 22.56% of the total food weight, respectively. According to the relative weight, Engraulis japonicus, Larimichthys polyactis and Pholis fangi were the most important prey species, while Leptochela gracilis, Alpheus distinguendus and Acetes chinensis were major preys according to the relative number.
Prey item | W/% | N/% | |
Pisces | 70.66 | 29.80 | |
Engraulis japonicus | 33.80 | 5.86 | |
Larimichthys polyactis | 16.62 | 1.00 | |
Enedrias fangi | 5.91 | 4.11 | |
Johnius belengerii | 2.86 | 0.37 | |
Thrissa kammalensis | 2.48 | 0.87 | |
Apogon lineatus | 1.91 | 2.00 | |
unidentified pisces | 1.20 | 3.99 | |
Trichiurus lepturus | 1.07 | 0.62 | |
Amblychaeturichthys hexanema | 1.05 | 0.87 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.63 | 4.61 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.54 | 2.12 | |
Thryssa mystax | 0.51 | 0.50 | |
Cynoglossus joyneri | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
Callionymus beniteguri | 0.32 | 0.12 | |
Collichthys lucidus | 0.33 | 0.87 | |
Callionymus sagitta | 0.31 | 0.12 | |
Coilia mystus | 0.23 | 0.12 | |
Rhinogobius pflaumi | 0.20 | 0.87 | |
Engraulidae | 0.19 | 0.12 | |
Tridentiger barbatus | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
Champsodon snyderi | 0.02 | 0.12 | |
Hippocampus japonicas | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
Crustacea | 22.56 | 53.49 | |
Charybdis bimaculata | 3.70 | 3.12 | |
Charybdis japonica | 3.49 | 0.37 | |
Alpheus distinguendus | 3.27 | 10.47 | |
to be continued |
The diet composition of C. myriaster showed clear ontogenetic variations (Fig. 6). Crustacea were the major prey groups for C. myriaster with AL<80 mm, whereas shrimps and fish were the major prey groups for individuals of 81–120 mm. Fish became the major prey group for individuals with AL>140 mm, and the proportion of fish prey increased with AL (Fig. 6).
This is the first study in recent decades on the fishery biology of C. myriaster in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, and may improve the understanding of growth, maturation, and feeding of C. myriaster. We systematically analyzed the biological characteristics of conger in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea, and found that the biological characters in this area tend to be different from previous studies in other areas. For example, the maximum age vary among study regions, and the maximum age was 4 years old in the Seto Inland Sea of Japan (Gorie et al., 2004), 13 years old in the southern waters of Korea (Bae et al., 2018), and 7 years old in the coastal waters of Korea (Kim et al., 2011). Besides, the VBGE parameters in the present study were estimated as L∞=1 026 mm and k=0.226. Kim et al. (2011) used the specimens collected in the southern coastal waters of Korea and reported the values of L∞=1 006 mm and k=0.146. Bae et al. (2018) reported the values of L∞=1 438 mm and k=0.081 used the otolith weight at age data in the southern waters of Korea. The L∞ in the southern waters of Korea was higher than our study, but value of k was lower. The results suggested a faster growth rate of C. myriaster in China seas. These may be attributed to the absence of elder individuals in our study, while it is also possible that a different growth characteristic exist for C. myriaster in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea.
It should be noted that maturing males (mid-meiotic stage) were captured in this study, and this is the first report that maturing males were found in China seas. In addition, sex ratio was 88:0 (female: male) in the East China Sea and 2.67:1 in the South Yellow Sea. This sex ratio basis were also reported in other areas for this species (Okamura et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2011; Kawazu et al., 2015), and also other species, such as Conger conger (Correia et al., 2009), suggesting that males and females may show differences in the habitat selection, time of maturation, and migration behaviors (Okamura et al., 2000; Kawazu et al., 2015). Our study revealed that the gonads of females began maturing at 3 years old, consistent with previous studies in the coastal waters of China (Tang and Wu, 1988; Chen, 1991), but different with the species in the continental shelf of East China Sea off Kuyushu Island of Japan (Kawazu et al., 2015). This may be result from different environmental conditions among studies, such as water temperature and current, which should be examined in further studies. It is note that, sampling gears was longlines in the previous studies (Tang and Wu, 1988), different sampling gears may affect the results of biological characteristics.
The spawn ground of C. myriaster was believed along the Kyushu-Palau Ridge, approximately 380 km south of Okinotorishima Island (Kurogi et al., 2012), and previous surveys in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea recorded large individuals began migrating southward in autumn, reaching the edge of the continental shelf in spring and summer (Tokimura, 2001; Zhang, 2010). This implies that the individuals in China seas may have a southward spawning migration. The hypothesis was supported by our results that gonad development stages for individuals captured in the East China Sea were higher than that in the Yellow Sea. In addition, the GSI increased from 16 March to 30 April in the East China Sea, when mean GSI value of mid–vitellogesis females were 5.86%, which supported the postulation that females develop their gonads from the primary to secondary yolk globule stage from winter to summer in the East China Sea (Kawazu et al., 2015). Previous study suggested that the mean GSI values of mid-vitellogenesis females were 4.40% in winter and 7.04% in summer in the East China Sea (Kawazu et al., 2015), generally agreed with our results.
Conger myriaster is a generalist predator (Choi et al., 2008) and preyed upon 65 prey species in this study. Fishes and crustacean were the most important food organisms in our observation. This was consistent with studies in the southern waters of Korea and Japanese waters (Huh and Kwak, 1998; Choi et al., 2008; Gorie and Nagasawa, 2010), except the difference in the food composition of smaller individuals. Compared with the studies during 1980–1990, there was obvious difference in the food composition (Chen, 1991), although the sample sits have slightly different. Some dominant prey species, such as Loligo chinensis, Thryssa kammalensis and Trachypenaeus curvirostris, were no longer main prey species for C. myriaster in this study. This result might correspond to the fact that some small fish species, such as Johnius belengerii, Enedrias fangi, have become dominant species in the Yellow Sea fisheries (Liu and Ning, 2011), and the C. myriaster is an opportunistic feeder that exploited the available prey in habitat area (Choi et al., 2008). The changes of food organisms for C. myriaster in recent years could contribute to the variations of individual growth characteristic. In addition, crustacean was the major prey groups for the smaller individuals, and then their diets shift to fish as the main food source with body growth. The diets changed at the AL longer than 140 mm and the GSI increased gradually with AL. The result might suggest that large individuals in the East China Sea were accumulating nutrition by changing diets for the spawn migration, when the density of food resources would be critical for the survival and successful reproduction of the population.
Bae J H, Bae H J, Park H M, et al. 2018. Age determination and growth estimates of the white-spotted conger eel, Conger myriaster (Brevoort, 1856) in marine waters of South Korea. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 34(3): 542–549
|
Chen Dagang. 1991. Fish Ecology in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea (in Chinese). Beijing: China Ocean Press, 218–221
|
Choi J H, Choi S H, Kim J B, et al. 2008. Feeding ecology of the white-spotted conger eel (Conger myriaster) in the Southern Sea of Korea. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (in Korean), 41(4): 282–288
|
Correia A T, Manso S, Coimbra J. 2009. Age, growth and reproductive biology of the European conger eel (Conger conger) from the Atlantic Iberian waters. Fisheries Research, 99(3): 196–202
|
Gorie S, Nagasawa K. 2010. Habitat preference and feeding habits of juvenile whitespotted conger Conger myriaster in the western Seto Inland Sea, Japan. The Aquaculture (in Japanese), 58(2): 167–179
|
Gorie S, Tanda M, Katayama S. 2004. Age and growth of white-spotted conger Conger myriaster collected in northeast Harima Nada, Seto Inland Sea. Aquaculture Science (in Japanese), 52(4): 407–411
|
Gorie S, Tanda M, Nagasawa K. 2010. Movement and growth of whitespotted conger Conger myriaster in the western Seto Inland Sea, Japan. Aquaculture Science (in Japanese), 58(2): 233–242
|
Harada M, Tokai T, Uchida K, et al. 2006. Distribution of white-spotted conger eel Conger myriaster and hagfish Eptatretus burgeri in the shallow region of Tokyo Bay. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi (in Japanese), 72(5): 894–904
|
Huh S H, Kwak S N. 1998. Feeding habits of Conger myriaster in the eelgrass (Zostera marina) bed in Kwangyang Bay. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (in Korean), 31(5): 665–672
|
Katayama S, Ishida T, Goto K, et al. 2002. A new aging technique by UV light observation of burnt otoliths for the conger eel Conger myriaster (Brevoort). Ichthyological Research, 49(1): 81–84
|
Katayama S, Ishida T, Shimizu Y, et al. 2004. Seasonal change in distribution of Conger eel Conger myriaster off the Pacific coast south of Tohoku, north-western Japan. Fisheries Science, 70(1): 1–6
|
Kawazu M, Kameda T, Kurogi H, et al. 2015. Biological characteristics of Conger myriaster during the initial stage of spawning migration in the East China Sea. Fisheries Science, 81(4): 663–671
|
Kim Y H, Lee E H, Kim J N, et al. 2011. Age and growth of whitespotted conger Conger myriaster in the southern Coastal Waters of Korea. Korean Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (in Korean), 44(6): 689–694
|
Kimura Y, Ishikawa S, Tokai T, et al. 2004. Early life history characteristics and genetic homogeneity of Conger myriaster leptocephali along the east coast of central Japan. Fisheries Research, 70(1): 61–69
|
Kurogi H, Mochioka N, Okazaki M, et al. 2012. Discovery of a spawning area of the common Japanese conger Conger myriaster along the Kyushu-Palau Ridge in the western North Pacific. Fisheries Science, 78(3): 525–532
|
Liu Jing, Ning Ping. 2011. Species composition and faunal characteristics of fishes in the Yellow Sea. Biodiversity Science (in Chinese), 19(6): 764–769
|
Liu Xifang, Liu He, Xue Ying, et al. 2015. Feeding ecology of Conger myriaster in Haizhou Bay. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China (in Chinese), 22(3): 517–527
|
Ogle D H. 2016. Introductory Fisheries Analyses with R. Boca Raton: CRC Press
|
Okamura A, Utoh T, Zhang Huan, et al. 2000. Seasonal changes in maturity in the conger eel Conger myriaster at the Pacific coast of Atsumi Peninsula, central Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi (in Japanese), 66(3): 412–416
|
Pauly D. 1981. The relationships between gill surface area and growth performance in fish: a generalization of von Bertalanffy’s theory of growth. Meeresforschung, 28(4): 251–282
|
Ricker W E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biology statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191: 200
|
Tang Yanli, Sun Guowei, Zhao Tongyang, et al. 2010. Mesh size selectivity of Conger myriaster pot. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China (in Chinese), 17(1): 136–142
|
Tang Yimin, Wu Changwen. 1988. On biologic habits and resources distribution of common Japanese conger Astroconger myriaster (Brevoort). Journal of Zhejiang College of Fisheries (in Chinese), 7(1): 19–26
|
Tokimura M. 2001. Conger-eel fisheries and fisheries resources in the East China Sea. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi (in Japanese), 67(1): 125–126
|
Utoh T, Horie N, Okamura A, et al. 2003. Oogenesis in the common Japanese conger Conger myriaster. Fisheries Science, 69(1): 181–188
|
Utoh T, Okamura A, Yamada Y, et al. 2004. Reproductive cycle in reared male common Japanese conger, Conger myriaster. Aquaculture, 240(1–4): 589–605
|
Von Bertalanffy L. 1951. Theoretische Biologie: II. Band, Stoffwechsel, Wachstum. 2nd ed. Bern, Switzerland: A Francke AG Verlag, 418
|
Yagi Y, Kodono N, Kinoshita I, et al. 2010. Late-stage metamorphosing Conger myriaster leptocephali collected in a river estuary of Ariake Bay, Japan. Ichthyological Research, 57(3): 310–313
|
Yamada U. 1986. Conger myriaster. In: Okamura O, ed. Fishes of the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea (in Japanese). Nagasaki: Seikai National Fisheries Research Laboratory, 68–69
|
Zhang Bo, Tang Qisheng. 2003. Feeding habits of six species of eels in East China Sea and Yellow Sea. Journal of Fisheries of China (in Chinese), 27(4): 307–314
|
Zhang Chunguang. 2010. Fauna Sinica: Osteichthyes, Anguilliformes and Notacanthiformes (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 199–203
|
Zhang Shiyi, Xiao Zhenyi, Zhang Youwei. 1977. Leptocephalus of the Aetro conger myriaster from the East China Sea. Acta Zoologica Sinica (in Chinese), 1: 117–118
|
Sample area | Survey time | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm |
Central Yellow Sea | Oct. 2016 | 237 | 132–575 | 317±129 |
Jan. 2017 | 94 | 195–440 | 252±45 | |
Apr. 2017 | 41 | 158–632 | 417±97 | |
Southern Yellow Sea | Feb. 2017 | 13 | 395–770 | 631±125 |
Apr. 2017 | 25 | 140–749 | 424 ±132 | |
East China Sea | Feb. 2017 | 18 | 241–726 | 587±129 |
Mar. 2017 | 28 | 492–785 | 547±86 | |
Apr. 2017 | 73 | 457–834 | 583±97 |
Age | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm | AL range/mm | Mean AL±SD/mm | BW range/g | Mean BW±SD/g |
1 | 59 | 176–359 | 241±31 | 56–137 | 91±13 | 6.0–64.3 | 18.6±8.9 |
2 | 84 | 193–493 | 336±52 | 88–189 | 129±21 | 14.5–190.3 | 55.7±31.5 |
3 | 36 | 322–764 | 497±102 | 124–333 | 206±47 | 50.8–645.9 | 257.2±152.0 |
4 | 43 | 447–787 | 643±74 | 173–294 | 252±27 | 127.9–915.5 | 473.8±156.2 |
5 | 30 | 572–834 | 700±64 | 230–321 | 270±22 | 335.8–112 1.2 | 580.5±184.8 |
6 | 3 | 643–745 | 711±59 | 261–290 | 277±15 | 370.1–755.6 | 596.8±201.6 |
Total | 255 | 176–834 | 436±183 |
Gonad development stage | Age | AL range/mm | Mean AL/mm | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD | GSI range/% | Mean GSI±SD/% | Number of specimens |
Peri-nucleolus stage | 2–3 | 146–169 | 158±16 | 401–431 | 416±20 | 0.49–0.62 | 0.55±0.42 | 3 |
Oil droplet stage | 3 | 174–190 | 181±8 | 462–504 | 481±67 | 1.79–1.96 | 1.89±0.25 | 3 |
Primary yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 200–295 | 256±22 | 545–751 | 678±72 | 1.87–8.01 | 5.17±1.41 | 64 |
Second yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 243–321 | 271 ±19 | 560–834 | 682±76 | 4.53–13.11 | 7.55±2.13 | 26 |
Mid-meiotic stage | 3 | 145–151 | 148±3 | 391–401 | 396±7 | 0.39–0.42 | 0.41±0.37 | 3 |
Prey item | W/% | N/% | |
Pisces | 70.66 | 29.80 | |
Engraulis japonicus | 33.80 | 5.86 | |
Larimichthys polyactis | 16.62 | 1.00 | |
Enedrias fangi | 5.91 | 4.11 | |
Johnius belengerii | 2.86 | 0.37 | |
Thrissa kammalensis | 2.48 | 0.87 | |
Apogon lineatus | 1.91 | 2.00 | |
unidentified pisces | 1.20 | 3.99 | |
Trichiurus lepturus | 1.07 | 0.62 | |
Amblychaeturichthys hexanema | 1.05 | 0.87 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.63 | 4.61 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.54 | 2.12 | |
Thryssa mystax | 0.51 | 0.50 | |
Cynoglossus joyneri | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
Callionymus beniteguri | 0.32 | 0.12 | |
Collichthys lucidus | 0.33 | 0.87 | |
Callionymus sagitta | 0.31 | 0.12 | |
Coilia mystus | 0.23 | 0.12 | |
Rhinogobius pflaumi | 0.20 | 0.87 | |
Engraulidae | 0.19 | 0.12 | |
Tridentiger barbatus | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
Champsodon snyderi | 0.02 | 0.12 | |
Hippocampus japonicas | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
Crustacea | 22.56 | 53.49 | |
Charybdis bimaculata | 3.70 | 3.12 | |
Charybdis japonica | 3.49 | 0.37 | |
Alpheus distinguendus | 3.27 | 10.47 | |
to be continued |
Sample area | Survey time | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm |
Central Yellow Sea | Oct. 2016 | 237 | 132–575 | 317±129 |
Jan. 2017 | 94 | 195–440 | 252±45 | |
Apr. 2017 | 41 | 158–632 | 417±97 | |
Southern Yellow Sea | Feb. 2017 | 13 | 395–770 | 631±125 |
Apr. 2017 | 25 | 140–749 | 424 ±132 | |
East China Sea | Feb. 2017 | 18 | 241–726 | 587±129 |
Mar. 2017 | 28 | 492–785 | 547±86 | |
Apr. 2017 | 73 | 457–834 | 583±97 |
Age | Number of specimens | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD/mm | AL range/mm | Mean AL±SD/mm | BW range/g | Mean BW±SD/g |
1 | 59 | 176–359 | 241±31 | 56–137 | 91±13 | 6.0–64.3 | 18.6±8.9 |
2 | 84 | 193–493 | 336±52 | 88–189 | 129±21 | 14.5–190.3 | 55.7±31.5 |
3 | 36 | 322–764 | 497±102 | 124–333 | 206±47 | 50.8–645.9 | 257.2±152.0 |
4 | 43 | 447–787 | 643±74 | 173–294 | 252±27 | 127.9–915.5 | 473.8±156.2 |
5 | 30 | 572–834 | 700±64 | 230–321 | 270±22 | 335.8–112 1.2 | 580.5±184.8 |
6 | 3 | 643–745 | 711±59 | 261–290 | 277±15 | 370.1–755.6 | 596.8±201.6 |
Total | 255 | 176–834 | 436±183 |
Gonad development stage | Age | AL range/mm | Mean AL/mm | TL range/mm | Mean TL±SD | GSI range/% | Mean GSI±SD/% | Number of specimens |
Peri-nucleolus stage | 2–3 | 146–169 | 158±16 | 401–431 | 416±20 | 0.49–0.62 | 0.55±0.42 | 3 |
Oil droplet stage | 3 | 174–190 | 181±8 | 462–504 | 481±67 | 1.79–1.96 | 1.89±0.25 | 3 |
Primary yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 200–295 | 256±22 | 545–751 | 678±72 | 1.87–8.01 | 5.17±1.41 | 64 |
Second yolk globule stage | 3–6 | 243–321 | 271 ±19 | 560–834 | 682±76 | 4.53–13.11 | 7.55±2.13 | 26 |
Mid-meiotic stage | 3 | 145–151 | 148±3 | 391–401 | 396±7 | 0.39–0.42 | 0.41±0.37 | 3 |
Prey item | W/% | N/% | |
Pisces | 70.66 | 29.80 | |
Engraulis japonicus | 33.80 | 5.86 | |
Larimichthys polyactis | 16.62 | 1.00 | |
Enedrias fangi | 5.91 | 4.11 | |
Johnius belengerii | 2.86 | 0.37 | |
Thrissa kammalensis | 2.48 | 0.87 | |
Apogon lineatus | 1.91 | 2.00 | |
unidentified pisces | 1.20 | 3.99 | |
Trichiurus lepturus | 1.07 | 0.62 | |
Amblychaeturichthys hexanema | 1.05 | 0.87 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.63 | 4.61 | |
Syngnathus acus | 0.54 | 2.12 | |
Thryssa mystax | 0.51 | 0.50 | |
Cynoglossus joyneri | 0.35 | 0.25 | |
Callionymus beniteguri | 0.32 | 0.12 | |
Collichthys lucidus | 0.33 | 0.87 | |
Callionymus sagitta | 0.31 | 0.12 | |
Coilia mystus | 0.23 | 0.12 | |
Rhinogobius pflaumi | 0.20 | 0.87 | |
Engraulidae | 0.19 | 0.12 | |
Tridentiger barbatus | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
Champsodon snyderi | 0.02 | 0.12 | |
Hippocampus japonicas | 0.01 | 0.12 | |
Crustacea | 22.56 | 53.49 | |
Charybdis bimaculata | 3.70 | 3.12 | |
Charybdis japonica | 3.49 | 0.37 | |
Alpheus distinguendus | 3.27 | 10.47 | |
to be continued |