Yueyun Wang, Hong Cheng, Chunsheng Wang. Alentiana palinpoda, a new commensal polynoid species from a seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40(12): 12-19. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1888-x
Citation: Yueyun Wang, Hong Cheng, Chunsheng Wang. Alentiana palinpoda, a new commensal polynoid species from a seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 40(12): 12-19. doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1888-x

Alentiana palinpoda, a new commensal polynoid species from a seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean

doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1888-x
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41806179; the China Ocean Mineral Resources Research and Development Association Program under contract Nos DY135-E2-2-03 and DY135-E2-2-07.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: wangsio@sio.org.cn
  • Received Date: 2021-06-22
  • Accepted Date: 2021-08-03
  • Available Online: 2021-09-29
  • Publish Date: 2021-11-25
  • Alentiana has only one member, A. aurantiaca (Verrill, 1885), commensal with sea anemone (Bolocera tuediae). Here, Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov., a second member in the genus Alentiana (subfamily Lepidastheniinae), a new commensal polynoid is described, based on a specimen collected from a deep-water seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. The new species is characterized by large elytra that completely cover the dorsum and are present in every third segment in the posterior regions. Neuropodia are truncated, with two types of neurochaetae; supraacicular chaetae toothed on one side with a slightly inflated end, and subacicular chaetae that are heavy and smooth; the prechaetal lobe is larger than the postchaetal lobe, with the ventral part rolling upward and backward.
  • Among polychaetes, polynoids have the highest number of symbiotic species found living with a wide variety of marine invertebrates, including other polychaetes (Salazar-Vallejo et al., 2015). Alentiana aurantiaca, the first and only member in this genus, living among the tentacles of the sea anemone Bolocera tuediae, was first described by Verrill (1885) as a member of Polynoe. After reviewing the type specimens, Hartman (1942) erected the genus Alentiana and recombined this species. Alentiana differs remarkably from the other genera of the family in having reduced notopodia without chaetae, and elytra present in every third segment in medial and posterior regions, neuropodial chaetae of two kinds: fine supraacicular chaetae with few rows of spines and single or few stouter, spine-like subacicular ones. Alentiana aurantiaca is described from northeastern coast of America (Verrill, 1885; Pettibone, 1963), and reported in European waters (Bellan, 2001).

    Norlinder et al. (2012) analyzed the phylogenetic relationship of Polynoidae and other Aphroditiformia scale worms via the morphology and molecular sequences of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. There were 30 species of the Polynoidae family used in their study, but only two species, Hyperhalosydna striata and Lepidasthenia elegans belonging to the subfamily Lepidastheniinae, had reported as having those four marker genes. This study is the first report of molecular marker genes: two nuclear genes (18S rDNA and 28S rDNA) and two mitochondrial genes (16S rDNA and the COI gene) in the genus Alentiana (Lepidastheniinae). The marker-gene data set was retrieved from next-generation sequencing (NGS) and whole genome survey sequences (GSS) and provided a method to obtain the gene information from the NGS and GSS data.

    In this contribution, Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov., the second member of this genus living as a commensal among the tentacles of the large sea anemone (Actiniidae), is described based on specimens collected from a seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. This is the first report on the four molecular marker genes in the Alentiana species which can supplement the gene information of family Polynoidae in the public gene database.

    The specimen was collected by Hailong III ROV (remotely-operated vehicle) DY56 Cruise (the 56th China Ocean Scientific Research) in September 2019. When photographs were taken of the sea anemone sample, this living scale-worm suddenly slipped out from the socket among the tentacles of Actiniidae. The iridescence of its elytra surfaces was remarkable and impressive.

    The specimen was preserved in a 95% ethanol solution and deposited in the Sample Repository of Second Institute of Oceanography (RSIO), Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou, China. The characteristics of the whole body were observed with appendages dissected under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi 305). Parapodium and neurochaetae were dissected, and mounted onto temporary slides using glycerol or permanent slides using Canada Balsam. Methyl green was used for staining in order to distinguish papillae on the Pharynx. Photographs of the chaetae were captured using light microscopy (Zeiss Axio Imager A2).

    The total genomic DNA of this specimen was extracted from its muscle appendage using QIAGEN DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kits (Qiagen, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Attempts to extract DNA from the elytra were unsuccessful, with little or nothing when we detected in the DNA concentration using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer and a Qubit fluorometer. The qualified DNA was stored in sterilized Milli-Q® water at –80°C before sequencing. The entire genome was obtained by Illumina sequencing. One pair-end (PE150) library was constructed with insert size of approximately 350 bp, and sequenced on HiSeqTM X-Ten platform (Illumina, CA, USA) at Zhejiang Tianke High Technology Development Co., Ltd. A total of 61 640 260 sequence clean reads and 8.86 Gbp clean bases (Q20 ≥ 98.96%) were obtained after quality trimming, and then de novo assembled by the SPAdes genome assembler (Bankevich et al., 2012). In order to pick out the nuclear 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA and mitochondrial 16S rDNA, and COI genes, the assembled contigs were aligned against the downloaded reference sequences of those four genes in the GenBank database via the NCBI local blastn program (Cock et al., 2015). The complete length of the COI gene sequence was checked, based on the result of invertebrate mitochondrial genome prediction by the MITOS server online (Bernt et al., 2013). The start and end of target sequences were checked by the reported universal primer pairs (Norlinder et al., 2012). The accession number of sequences used in phylogenic analysis is listed in Table 1.

    Table  1.  List of information of 76 species and GenBank accession numbers of marker genes
    FamilySpecies nameOriginVoucherAccession numberReference
    18S rDNA28S rDNA16S rDNAcox1 gene
    PolynoidaeAbyssarya acusClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1811
    MH233231MH233179MH233277Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Acholoe squamosaFranceSMNH118959AY839567JN852850JN852888AY839576Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Alentia gelatinosaTrondheimsfjord,
    Norway
    AY839566AY839577Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Alentiana palinpodaPacific OceanB6317500003MW397195 MW405100 MW397208 MW374288this study
    Antarctinoe feroxRoss SeaKF713423KF713463KF713373Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Bathyedithia retiereiClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1814
    MH233215MH233157Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bathyeliasona mariaaeClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1815
    MH233204MH233149MH233249Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bathyfauvelia glacigenaClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1817
    MH233218MH233160MH233274Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bathyfauvelia ignigenaClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1819
    MH233246MH233200MH233262Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bathymoorea lucasiClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1822
    MH233223MH233165MH233266Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bathypolaria sp. 173Clarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    PNT 63
    MH233206MH233151MH233281Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Branchinotogluma bipapillataSouthwest Indian RidgeRSIO3530MH717079MH717078MH202755Zhou et al. (2018)
    Branchinotogluma elytropapillataOkinawa TroughNSMT-Pol P-668MG799378MG799380MG799377MG799387Zhang et al. (2018a)
    Branchinotogluma ovataManus Back-Arc BasinMBM286062-sps2 MK211411MK211413MK211416MK357896Wu et al. (2019)
    Branchinotogluma sandersiJuan de Fuca RidgeSMNH118960JN852821JN852851JN852889JN852923Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Branchinotogluma segonzaciManus Back-Arc BasinMBM286042MK211412MK211418MK357906Wu et al. (2019)
    Branchinotogluma trifurcusManus Back-Arc BasinMBM286046MK211410MK211415MK357905Wu et al. (2019)
    Branchipolynoe longqiensisLongqi field, Southwest Indian Ocean RidgeKY753847KY753847KY753826KY753826Zhang et al. (2018b)
    Branchipolynoe pettiboneaeSeep, South China SeaKY753840KY753840KY753825KY753825Zhang et al. (2018b)
    Bruunilla nealaeClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1824
    MH233216MH233158Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Bylgides elegansSwedenSMNH118962JN852822JN852852JN852890JN852924Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Bylgides sarsiSwedenSMNH118961JN852823JN852853JN852891JN852925Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Capitulatinoe cf. cupisetisClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneKF919301KF919303Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Eunoe nodosaNorwaySMNH118963JN852824JN852854JN852892JN852926Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Gastrolepidia clavigeraPapua New GuineaSMNH118964JN852825JN852855JN852893JN852927Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Gattyana ciliataSan Juan Channel, WAUSNM1077218AY894297DQ790035AY894312Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Gattyana cirrhosaSwedenSMNH118965JN852826JN852856JN852894JN852928Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Gesiella jameensisLanzarote, Canary
    Islands
    KY454403KY823476KY454412KY454429Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Halosydna brevisetosaCaliforniaSMNH118966JN852827JN852857JN852895AY894313Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Halosydnella australisBaia de Paranagua,
    Pontal do Sul, Brazil
    KY823449KY823463KY823480KY823495Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Harmothoe glabraEnglandSMNH118967JN852828JN852858JN852896JN852929Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Harmothoe imbricataBohuslan, SwedenAY340434AY340400AY340463AY839580Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Harmothoe imparSwedenSMNH118968JN852829JN852859JN852897JN852930Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Harmothoe oculinarumNorwaySMNH118969AY894299JN852860JN852898AY894314Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Harmothoe rarispinaDisko Island, GreenlandKY657611KY657624KY657641KY657659Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Hermenia verruculosaBelizeSMNH118970JN852830JN852861JN852899JN852931Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Hodor andurilClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1826
    MH233240MH233191MH233288Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Hodor hodorClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1825
    MH233238MH233189MH233257Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Hyperhalosydna striataJapanSMNH118971JN852831JN852862JN852900JN852932Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Intoshella dictyaulusnear Mariana TrenchMBM 304568MG519807MG519808Sui et al. (2019)
    Lepidasthenia elegansFranceSMNH118973JN852832JN852863JN852901JN852933Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Lepidonotus clavaEnglandSMNH118974JN852833JN852864JN852902JN852934Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Lepidonotus squamatusSwedenSMNH118975AY176290JN852865JN852903AY894316Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Lepidonotus sublevisMunlo Cove, Griffin Bay, WAUSNM107222AY894301DQ790039AY894317Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Levensteiniella undomarginataOkinawa TroughCBM-ZW 1118MG799379 MG799381 MG799376 MG799385Zhang et al. (2018a)
    Macellicephala clarionensisClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1828
    MH233233MH233183 MH233269Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Macellicephala parvafaucesClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1831
    MH233210MH233153 MH233282Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Macellicephaloides moustachuClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1832
    MH233212Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Malmgreniella mcintoshiSwedenSMNH118976JN852834JN852866JN852904JN852935Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Melaenis loveniSvalbardSMNH118977JN852835JN852867JN852905JN852936Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Neopolynoe paradoxaNorwaySMNH118978JN852836JN852868JN852906JN852937Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Nu aakhuClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1836
    MH233209Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Paradyte crinoidicolaPapua New GuineaSMNH118979JN852837JN852869JN852907JN852938Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Paralepidonotus ampulliferusPapua New GuineaSMNH118980JN852838AF185164JN852908JN852939Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Pelagomacellicephala cf. iliffeiEleuthera, BahamasZMUC-POL-2394KY454408KY823474KY454420KY454435Gonzalez et al. (2018)
    Polaruschakov lamellaeClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1837
    MH233205MH233150MH233250Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Polynoe scolopendrinaEnglandSMNH118981JN852839JN852870JN852909JN852940Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Thormora jukesiiJapanSMNH118983JN852840JN852871JN852910JN852941Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Yodanoe desbruyeresiClarion-Clipperton Fracture ZoneMNHN-IA-
    TYPE 1843
    MH233156MH233251Bonifácio and Menot (2019)
    Outgroup
    SigalionidaeNeoleanira tetragonaSwedenSMNH118984AY839570JN852872JN852911AY839582Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Psammolyce sp. EN 2012BelizeSMNH118989JN852843JN852877JN852916Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Sigalion spinosusAY894304DQ790062AY894319Norlinder et al. (2012)
    IphionidaeIphione sp.Papua New GuineaSMNH118972JN852819JN852886JN852921Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Thermiphione sp. EN 2012Fiji, Lau BasinSMNH118982JN852820JN852849JN852887JN852922Norlinder et al. (2012)
    ChrysopetalidaeChloeia flavaJapanSMNH95025EF076780EF076781JN852917JN852944Norlinder et al. (2012)
    EuphrosinidaeEuphrosine foliosaBanyuls,SMNH95028EF076784EF076785JN852918JN852945Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Mexieulepis weberiBelizeSMNH118958JN852818JN852885JN852920Norlinder et al. (2012)
    NereididaeNereis pelagicaSweden, paragenophoreSMNH118992AF474279AY612636AY340470JN852947Norlinder et al. (2012)
    SyllidaeEusyllis blomstrandiSweden, paragenophoreSMNH118994EF123887JN852880EF123788EF123749Norlinder et al. (2012)
    GlyceridaeGlycera albaSweden, paragenophoreSMNH118991AY176287DQ779689DQ779615JN852946Norlinder et al. (2012)
    AphroditidaeAphrodita aculeataSwedenSMNH118956AY176281JN852846JN852882AY839578Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Laetmonice filicornisSwedenSMNH118955JN852816JN852847JN852883JN852919Norlinder et al. (2012)
    PholoidaePholoe balticaSwedenSMNH118985AY839573JN852873JN852912AY839585Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Pholoe pallidaSwedenSMNH118986AY894302JN852874JN852913AY894318Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Pisione remotaAY525628AF221575Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Pisionidens sp.MexicoSMNH118988JN852842JN852876JN852915JN852943Norlinder et al. (2012)
    Note: – means the data had not reported in the database.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Nuclear and mitochondrial sequences were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm with default settings (15/6.66 as gap/gap length penalties) in Geneious Prime software (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand). The alignments of nuclear 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA and mitochondrial 16S rDNA and COI genes were performed separately, and then concatenated into one file after manually trimming unalignable regions on both flanks. The phylogenetic tree was performed with Maximum Likelihood analysis (ML), using the IQ-TREE Web Server (Trifinopoulos et al., 2016) with auto-selected substitution model, default parameters and 1 000 bootstrap replicates (command line: path_to_iqtree -s concatenated_alignments.phy -spp concatenated_alignments. partition.txt -pre concatenated_alignments.phy -m TEST -bb 1000 -alrt 1000). The SH-aLRT test (Guindon et al., 2010) was performed with the manual’s recommendation of adding “-alrt 1000” into the IQ-TREE command line.

    Family Polynoidae Kinberg, 1856

    Subfamily Lepidastheniinae Pettibone, 1989

    Genus Alentiana Hartman, 1942

    Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. (Fig. 1)

    Figure  1.  Holotype of Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. a. Living Alentiana and sea anemone in situ; b. dorsal view of living specimen (pharynx introverted); c. pharynx; d. ventral view of specimen; e and f. dorsal view of head (elytra removed); g. opening of the pharynx distally encircled by nine pairs of bulbous papillae, white arrows show the subterminal lateral papillae; h and i. two pairs of dorsal and ventral jaws respectively; j. ventral view of head; k. dorsal view of segments in mid-body (black arrows show notopodia, white arrows show elytrophores); l. ventral view of the 6th parapodium; m. posterior view of the 15th parapodium (black arrows show notopodium, white arrows show elytrophore); n. anterior view of the 15th parapodium (black arrows show noto- and neuroacicula); o. posterior view of the 15th neuropodium; p and q. ventral and dorsal view of elytra respectively; r. subacicular chaeta; s. supraacicular chaeta. g–i were stained with methyl green. Scale bars: 0.5 cm (d), 1.0 mm (f), 0.5 mm (h–i), 100 μm (m–n and p–s).

    Material examined. Holotype, catalog number B6317500003, unnamed seamount in the Northwest Pacific Oecan, 15°31′N, 161°48′E, 1 156 m depth, commensally with a sea anemone (Actiniidae), September 20, 2019.

    Diagnosis. Body short with 37 segments. Elytra large, completely covering dorsal surface, present in every third segment in posterior regions. Notopodia reduced, without notochaetae. Neuropodia truncated, with two types of neurochaetae; prechaetal lobe larger than postchaetal lobe, with ventral part rolling upward and backward.

    Description. Holotype complete, ca. 32 mm long, 13 mm wide, including parapodia, with 37 segments (including tentacular segment), last two small. Body dorsoventrally flattened, not tapering posteriorly, with very long parapodia.

    Prostomium bilobed, wider than long, without cephalic peaks. Two pairs of conspicuous dark eyes, anterior pair largest, situated laterally on widest part of prostomium, posterior pair dorsally, near hind margin of prostomium. Median and lateral antennae present; medium antenna with bulbous ceratophore in anterior notch of prostomium and a long style about two times the length of lateral ones; lateral antennae inserted terminally on prostomium, with ceratophores formed by anterior prolongations of prostomial lobes. Styles smooth, tapering. Palps stout, 1.5 times thicker than antennae, tapered, smooth, and slightly shorter than median antenna. Facial tubercle absent. Pharynx with two pairs of jaws without any teeth (Figs 1h and i) and encircled distally by nine pairs of bulbous papillae (Figs 1b, c, and g). Two pairs of lateral papillae on subterminal pharynx (Figs 1b, c, and g). Tentacular segment (Segment 1) with two pair tentaculophores directed anteriorly, lateral to prostomium, without chaetae (Fig. 1j); tentacular cirri longer than median antenna. Second segment with first pair of elytra, sub-biramous parapodia, and ventral cirri obviously longer than the following ones. Parapodia same from second segment to the end of the body.

    Sixteen pairs of large, bulbous elytrophores present on Segments 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 26, 29, 32, and 35. Elytra large, completely covering the dorsum, oval to subreniform in shape, without papillae or microtubercles on margin and surface (Figs 1p and q). Dorsal tubercles on cirrigerous segments, indistinct (Fig. 1k). Parapodia sub-biramous (Figs 1m and n) throughout body, with embedded noto- and neuroacicula (Fig. 1n). Dorsal cirri on cirrigerous segments elongate, about six to seven times longer than ventral cirri. Notopodia reduced to a small digitate lobe, without chaetae (Figs 1k and m). Neuropodia distally truncate, elongate, notched dorsally and ventrally (Fig. 1o), prechaetal lobe larger than postchaetal lobe, forming upward flanged structure in ventral side, and enveloping ventral side of postchaetal lobe (Figs 1l and o). Neurochaetae of two kinds, including six to ten supraacicular chaetae toothed on one side (Fig. 1s) with a slightly inflated end and a heavy, smooth, subacicular chaeta (rarely two in a parapodium), with falcate tip and smooth sides (Fig. 1r). All chaetae and acicula yellow. The ventral nephridial papillae small, beginning on Segment 4.

    Color: body and pharynx red, elytra dark brown in live specimen; body pale yellow with dark pigments (Figs 1ad), elytra white in ethanol-preserved specimen (Figs 1em).

    Etymology. The specific name palinpoda is a combination of the Greek palin- (backward) and poda (foot), referring to the ventral side of neuropodia of the new species rolling upward and backward.

    Distribution. Only known from the type locality.

    Remarks. Alentiana aurantiaca (Verrill, 1885) was the only known member of the genus Alentiana prior to the report of this new species. The major characteristics of Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. are mostly similar to those of A. aurantiaca, originally described from northeastern coast of America (Verrill, 1885; Hartman, 1942). Both species are commensal among the tentacles of Actiniidae (sea anemone). However, Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. clearly differs from A. aurantiaca in the number of chaetigers, the arrangement of elytra, neuropodium, and subacicular chaeta as follows. (1) About 39 chaetigers are present in A. aurantiaca, whilst there are 37 in A. palinpoda sp. nov. (2) Large elytra completely cover the dorsum in A. palinpoda sp. nov., whereas those of A. aurantiaca leave the median dorsum broadly exposed. (3) The neuropodium of A.aurantiaca has triangular chaetal lobes, and the prechaetal lobe slightly exceeds the postchaetal lobe in length. However, that of A. palinpoda sp. nov. is truncated with pre- and postchaetal lobes equal; the prechaetal lobe of A. palinpoda sp. nov. is larger than the postchaetal lobe in width, and rolls upward and backward on the ventral side. And (4) the distal end of the subacicular chaeta is more curved in A. palinpoda sp. nov.

    The information of selected taxa for phylogenetic analysis is presented in Table 1. The length of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA and 16S rDNA was confirmed by the respective sequences of PCR primers (Norlinder et al., 2012). The primer-sequence alignments of PCR primers located in the position of related genes are shown in the schematic map (Fig. A1 in Appendix). This study can also provides base information to design or edit primers when we need to amplify the gene fragments of relevant species. The data set of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA partial sequence and COI complete sequence of Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. (voucher B6317500003) contained 1 013 bp (1 013 bp used in phylogenetic analysis, total length 1 481 bp), 1 108 bp, 527 bp and 1 524 bp, respectively.

    The ML tree was constructed based on the concatenated alignment file of Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. and 75 reference species (Fig. 2). Molecular phylogeny revealed the subfamily Lepidonotinae Willey, 1902 is a polyphyletic group. Lepidasthenia elegans and Hyperhalosydna striata are cluseterd with members of Lepidonotinae. Both of the two genera belong to the subfamily Lepidastheniinae (Pettibone, 1989). This topology suggests a closed relationship between Lepidonotinae and Lepidastheniinae and the monophyly of Lepidonotinae is doubtful. Lepidonotinae differs from Lepidastheniinae in the form of neuropodia and elytra (Wehe, 2006). Neuropodia are deeply incised dorsally and ventrally in Lepidastheniinae, whilst not deeply incised in Lepidonotinae. Elytra are usually small, not covering the mid-dorsum and smooth in Lepidastheniinae while they are usually large, covering the mid-dorsum and ornamented in Lepidonotinae. Elytra of Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. are large, covering the mid-dorsum. This characteristic makes it easily distinguishable from other members of Lepidastheniinae. Alentiana palinpoda sp. nov. and Bathymoorea_lucasi (subfamily Eulagiscinae) form a well supported clade. Bathymoorea has one pair of large eyes, elongate acicular lobe and numerous notochaetae. Bonifácio and Menot (2019) synonymize all these subfamilies lacking lateral antennae (Bathyedithinae, Bathymacellinae, Branchinotogluminae, Branchiplicatinae, Branchipolynoinae, Lepidonotopodinae, Macellicephalinae, Macellicephaloidinae, Macelloidinae, Polaruschakovinae and Vampiropolynoinae) with Macellicephalinae sensu Hartmann-Schröder, 1971. Hatch et al. (2020) reinstated Lepidonotopodinae comprised of Branchipolynoe, Branchinotogluma, Bathykurila, Branchiplicatus, Lepidonotopodium, Levensteiniella, Thermopolynoe, and Peinaleopolynoe. In our tree, Lepidonotopodinae clustered with partial members of Macellicephalinae with low supported value. Our results support the phylogenetic proposal of Bonifácio and Menot (2019). The phylogenetic relationship between Lepidastheniinae and other polynoid subfamilies has not been fully investigated yet. Lepidastheniinae comprised of 10 genera (Alentiana, Benhamipolynoe, Hyperhalosydna, Lepidasthenia, Lepidastheniella, Parahalosydna, Perolepis, Pseudopolynoe, Showapolynoe, Telolepidasthenia), while only three of them included in our analysis. Further analyses would be required to assess the taxonomic relationship between Lepidastheniinae and Lepidonotinae.

    Figure  2.  Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 59 polynoid species from six subfamilies of Polynoidae, showing the relationships of the novel species Alentiana palinpoda and related taxa. The tree is assessed from the concatenated alignments of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA and COI gene. Each branch was assigned SH-aLRT supports. Numbers near the branch nodes refer to SH-aLRT support values (all based on 1 000 replicates). Lepidastheniinae genera are highlighted with yellow color. The clade appeared to be more reliably supported when its SH-aLRT value is equal or greater than 80%.

    We thank the crew of R/V Dayang Yihao and technical staff of Hailong III ROV for their great help during the investigation. We thank Yang Li for his assistance in sea anemone identification.

    A1.  The schematic map of PCR primers locate position in the target marker genes. The arrows the amplified orientation in the sequence. The vertical wavy lines present the abridged nucleotide base. The colorful base and red pane show the discrepancy between gene and primer sequence. Red-filled circles show the wobble bases in the primers. The universal name ofprimers is listed in the left edge. This alignment information can provide the evidence to design or edit the primers when amplifying the gene fragments of relevant species.
  • [1]
    Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology, 19(5): 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
    [2]
    Bellan G. 2001. Polychaeta. In: Costello M J, Emblow C, White R J, eds. European Register of Marine Species: A Check-List of the Marine Species in Europe and a Bibliography of Guides to their Identification. Collection Patrimoines Naturels, 50: 214–231
    [3]
    Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, et al. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 69(2): 313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023
    [4]
    Bonifácio P, Menot L. 2019. New genera and species from the Equatorial Pacific provide phylogenetic insights into deep-sea Polynoidae (Annelida). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 185(3): 555–635. doi: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zly063
    [5]
    Cock P J A, Chilton J M, Grüning B, et al. 2015. NCBI BLAST+ integrated into Galaxy. GigaScience, 4(1): 39. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0080-7
    [6]
    Gonzalez B C, Martínez A, Borda E, et al. 2018. Phylogeny and systematics of Aphroditiformia. Cladistics, 34(3): 225–259. doi: 10.1111/cla.12202
    [7]
    Guindon S, Dufayard J F, Lefort V, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59(3): 307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010
    [8]
    Hartman O. 1942. A review of the types of Polychaetous Annelids at the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University. Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection, 8: 1–98
    [9]
    Hatch A S, Liew H, Hourdez S, et al. 2020. Hungry scale worms: Phylogenetics of Peinaleopolynoe (Polynoidae, Annelida), with four new species. Zookeys, 932: 27–74. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.932.48532
    [10]
    Norlinder E, Nygren A, Wiklund H, et al. 2012. Phylogeny of scale-worms (Aphroditiformia, Annelida), assessed from 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), and morphology. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 65(2): 490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.07.002
    [11]
    Pettibone M H. 1963. Marine polychaete worms of the New England region: I. Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 227: 1–356
    [12]
    Pettibone M H. 1989. A new species of Benhamipolynoe (Polychaeta: Polynoidae: Lepidastheniinae) from Australia, associated with the unattached stylasterid coral Conopora adeta. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102(2): 300–304
    [13]
    Salazar-Vallejo S I, González N E, Salazar-Silva P. 2015. Lepidasthenia loboi sp. n. from Puerto Madryn, Argentina (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). ZooKeys, 546: 21–37. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.546.6175
    [14]
    Sui Jixing, Li Xinzheng, Kou Qi. 2019. A new species of the genus Intoshella Darboux, 1899 (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) commensal with a deep-sea sponge from a seamount near the Mariana Trench. Marine Biodiversity, 49(3): 1479–1488. doi: 10.1007/s12526-018-0922-5
    [15]
    Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L T, von Haeseler A, et al. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(W1): W232–W235. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256
    [16]
    Verrill A E. 1885. Notice of recent additions to the marine Invertebrata of the northeastern coast of America, with descriptions of new genera and species and critical remarks on others: Part V. Annelida, Echinodermata, Hydroida, Tunicata. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 8(27/28): 424–448
    [17]
    Wehe T. 2006. Revision of the scale worms (Polychaeta: Aphroditoidea) occurring in the seas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula: Part I. Polynoidae. Fauna of Arabia, 22: 23–197
    [18]
    Wu Xuwen, Zhan Zifeng, Xu Kuidong. 2019. Two new and two rarely known species of Branchinotogluma (Annelida: Polynoidae) from deep-sea hydrothermal vents of the Manus Back-Arc basin, with remarks on the diversity and biogeography of vent polynoids. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 149: 103051. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2019.05.011
    [19]
    Zhang Yanjie, Chen Chong, Qiu Jianwen. 2018a. Sexually dimorphic scale worms (Annelida: Polynoidae) from hydrothermal vents in the Okinawa trough: Two new species and two new sex morphs. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5: 112. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00112
    [20]
    Zhang Yanjie, Sun Jin, Rouse G W, et al. 2018b. Phylogeny, evolution and mitochondrial gene order rearrangement in scale worms (Aphroditiformia, Annelida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 125: 220–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.04.002
    [21]
    Zhou Yadong, Wang Yueyun, Zhang Dongsheng, et al. 2018. Branchinotogluma bipapillata n. sp., a new branchiate scale worm (Annelida: Polynoidae) from two hydrothermal fields on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Zootaxa, 4482(3): 527–540. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4482.3.5
  • Relative Articles

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (827) PDF downloads(43) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return