Circulation in the South China Sea is in a state of forced oscillation: Results from a simple reduced gravity model with a closed boundary

Rui Xin Huang; Hui Zhou

doi:10.1007/s13131-022-2013-5

Volume 41 Issue 7

Jul. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Acta Oceanologica Sinica > 2022 > 41(7): 1-12

Rui Xin Huang, Hui Zhou. Circulation in the South China Sea is in a state of forced oscillation: Results from a simple reduced gravity model with a closed boundary[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(7): 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2013-5

Citation:

Rui Xin Huang, Hui Zhou. Circulation in the South China Sea is in a state of forced oscillation: Results from a simple reduced gravity model with a closed boundary[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(7): 1-12. doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2013-5

Citation:

PDF( 1722 KB)

Circulation in the South China Sea is in a state of forced oscillation: Results from a simple reduced gravity model with a closed boundary

doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2013-5

Rui Xin Huang¹,
Hui Zhou^{2, 3, 4
,
,}

1.
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA
2.
Key Laboratory of Ocean Circulation and Waves, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
3.
Laboratory for Ocean Dynamics and Climate, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
4.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funds: The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences under contract No. XDB42000000; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41876009.

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: zhouhui@qdio.ac.cn
Received Date: 2021-06-10
Accepted Date: 2021-11-26

Available Online: 2022-04-29

Publish Date: 2022-07-08

Abstract

Abstract

The South China Sea (SCS) is a narrow semi-enclosed basin, ranging from 4°–6°N to 21°–22°N meridionally. It is forced by a strong annual cycle of monsoon-related wind stress. The Coriolis parameter f increases at least three times from the southern basin to the northern basin. As a result, the basin-cross time for the first baroclinic Rossby wave in the southern part of the basin is about 10-times faster than that in the northern part, which plays the most vitally important role in setting the circulation. At the northernmost edge of SCS, the first baroclinic Rossby wave takes slightly less than 1 year to move across the basin, however, it takes only 1–2 months in the southernmost part. Therefore, circulation properties for a station in the model ocean are not solely determined by the forcing at that time instance only; instead, they depend on the information over the past months. The combination of a strong annual cycle of wind forcing and large difference of basin-cross time for the first baroclinic Rossby wave leads to a strong seasonal cycle of the circulation in the SCS, hence, the circulation is dominated by the forced oscillations, rather than the quasi-steady state discussed in many textbooks.The circulation in the SCS is explored in detail by using a simple reduced gravity model forced by seasonally varying zonal wind stress. In particular, for a given time snap the western boundary current in the SCS cannot play the role of balancing mass transport across each latitude nor balancing mechanical energy and vorticity in the whole basin. In a departure from the steady wind-driven circulation discussed in many existing textbooks, the circulation in the SCS is characterized by the imbalance of mechanical energy and vorticity for the whole basin at any part of the seasonal cycle. In particular, the western boundary current in the SCS cannot balance the mass, mechanical energy, and vorticity in the seasonal cycle of the basin. Consequently, the circulation near the western boundary cannot be interpreted in terms of the wind stress and thermohaline forcing at the same time. Instead, circulation properties near the western boundary should be interpreted in terms of the contributions due to the delayed wind stress and the eastern boundary layer thickness. In fact, there is a clear annual cycle of net imbalance of mechanical energy and vorticity source/sink. Results from such a simple model may have important implications for our understanding of the complicated phenomena in the SCS, either from in-situ observations or numerical simulations.
- South China Sea,
- ocean circulation,
- annual cycle,
- first baroclinic Rossby wave propagation,
- western boundary current,
- forced ossilation

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	Cai Shuqun, Long Xiaomin, Wu Renhao, et al. 2008. Geographical and monthly variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation in the South China Sea. Journal of Marine Systems, 74(1–2): 711–720. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.12.008
[2]	Chu P C, Edmons N L, Fan Chenwu. 1999. Dynamical mechanisms for the South China Sea seasonal circulation and thermohaline variabilities. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 29(11): 2971–2989. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029<2971:DMFTSC>2.0.CO;2
[3]	Fang Wendong, Fang Guohong, Shi Ping, et al. 2002. Seasonal structures of upper layer circulation in the southern South China Sea from in situ observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 107(C11): 3202. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001343
[4]	Gan Jianping, Li H, Curchitser E N, et al. 2006. Modeling South China Sea circulation: Response to seasonal forcing regimes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111(C6): C06034
[5]	He Zhigang, Lyu Kewei, Quan Qi. 2020. The South China Sea western boundary current. In: Hu J, Ho C R, Xie L, et al., eds. Regional Oceanography of the South China Sea. Singapore: World Scientific, 77–99
[6]	Huang Rui xin. 1986. Numerical simulation of wind-driven circulation in a subtropical/subpolar basin. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 16(10): 1636–1650. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1986)016<1636:NSOWDC>2.0.CO;2
[7]	Huang Rui xin. 2010. Ocean Circulation: Wind-Driven and Thermohaline Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
[8]	Liang Xiangshan. 2017. The seasonally varying monsoon wind may suppress the western boundary current in the South China Sea. Oceanography & Fisheries Open Access Journal, 3(1): 555601
[9]	Pedlosky J. 1965. A study of the time dependent ocean circulation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 22(3): 267–272. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1965)022<0267:ASOTTD>2.0.CO;2
[10]	Qu Tangdong. 2000. Upper-layer circulation in the South China Sea. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 30(6): 1450–1460. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1450:ULCITS>2.0.CO;2
[11]	Shaw P T, Chao S Y, Fu L L. 1999. Sea surface height variations in the South China Sea from satellite altimetry. Oceanologica Acta, 22(1): 1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0399-1784(99)80028-0
[12]	Stommel H. 1948. The westward intensification of wind-driven ocean currents. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 29(2): 202–206
[13]	Wang Guihua, Chen Dake, Su Jilan. 2006. Generation and life cycle of the dipole in the South China Sea summer circulation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 111: C06002
[14]	Wyrtki K. 1961. Physical oceanography of the Southeast Asian waters. La Jolla: The University of California
[15]	Yang Haijun, Liu Qinyu. 2003. Forced Rossby wave in the northern South China Sea. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 50(7): 917–926. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(03)00074-8
[16]	Yang Haijun, Liu Qinyu, Liu Zhengyu, et al. 2002. A general circulation model study of the dynamics of the upper ocean circulation of the South China Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 107(C7): 22-1–22-14
[17]	Yang Jiayan, Price James F. 2000. Water-mass formation and potential vorticity balance in an abyssal ocean circulation. Journal of Marine Research, 58: 789−808.