Xuyang Wei, Xin Liu, Zhen Li, Xiaotao Chang, Hongxin Luo, Chengcheng Zhu, Jinyun Guo. Gravity anomalies determined from mean sea surface model data over the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. doi: 10.1007/s13131-023-2178-6
Citation:
Xuyang Wei, Xin Liu, Zhen Li, Xiaotao Chang, Hongxin Luo, Chengcheng Zhu, Jinyun Guo. Gravity anomalies determined from mean sea surface model data over the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. doi: 10.1007/s13131-023-2178-6
Xuyang Wei, Xin Liu, Zhen Li, Xiaotao Chang, Hongxin Luo, Chengcheng Zhu, Jinyun Guo. Gravity anomalies determined from mean sea surface model data over the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. doi: 10.1007/s13131-023-2178-6
Citation:
Xuyang Wei, Xin Liu, Zhen Li, Xiaotao Chang, Hongxin Luo, Chengcheng Zhu, Jinyun Guo. Gravity anomalies determined from mean sea surface model data over the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. doi: 10.1007/s13131-023-2178-6
College of Geodesy and Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao Shandong 266590, China
2.
Land Satellite Remote Sensing Application Center of MNR, Beijing 100048, China
3.
School of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan Shandong 250101, China
Funds:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 42274006, 42174041 and 41774001; the Research Fund of Shandong University of Science and Technology under contract No. 2014TDJH101.
With the improvements in the density and quality of satellite altimetry data, a high-precision and high-resolution mean sea surface model containing abundant information regarding a marine gravity field can be calculated from long-time series multi-satellite altimeter data. Therefore, in this study, a method is proposed for determining marine gravity anomalies from a mean sea surface model. Taking the Gulf of Mexico (15°–32°N, 80°–100°W) as the study area and using a removal-recovery method, the residual gridded deflections of the vertical (DOVs) are calculated by combining the mean sea surface, mean dynamic topography, and XGM2019e_2159 geoid, and then using the inverse Vening-Meinesz method to determine the residual marine gravity anomalies from the residual gridded DOVs. Finally, residual gravity anomalies are added to the XGM2019e_2159 gravity anomalies to derive marine gravity anomaly models. In this study, the marine gravity anomalies are estimated with mean sea surface models CNES_CLS15MSS, DTU21MSS, and SDUST2020MSS and the mean dynamic topography models CNES_CLS18MDT and DTU22MDT. The accuracy of the marine gravity anomalies derived by the mean sea surface model is assessed based on ship-borne gravity data. The results show that the difference between the gravity anomalies derived by DTU21MSS and CNES_CLS18MDT and those of the ship-borne gravity data is optimal. With an increase in the distance from the coast, the difference between the gravity anomalies derived by mean sea surface models and ship-borne gravity data gradually decreases. The accuracy of the difference between the gravity anomalies derived by mean sea surface models and those from ship-borne gravity data is optimal at a depth of 3–4 km. The accuracy of the gravity anomalies derived by the mean sea surface model is high.
Figure 1. Study area and ship-borne gravity trace distribution. The thick solid red line is ship-borne gravity trace; the light gray area is land; the dark gray area corresponds to the marine regions that have been excluded from consideration or inclusion in this study.
Figure 2. Calculation diagram of the residual gridded DOVs.
Figure 3. Flowchart of data processing of deriving gravity anomalies using the mean sea surface model.
Figure 5. Differences among six marine gravity anomaly models. a. Grav-1-Grav-2; b. Grav-1-Grav-3; c. Grav-1-Grav-4; d. Grav-1-Grav-5; e. Grav-1-Grav-6; f. Grav-2-Grav-3; g. Grav-2-Grav-4; h. Grav-2-Grav-5; i. Grav-2-Grav-6; j. Grav-3-Grav-4; k. Grav-3-Grav-5; l. Grav-3-Grav-6; m. Grav-4-Grav-5; n. Grav-4-Grav-6; o. Grav-5-Grav-6.
Figure 6. Histogram distribution of differences among six marine gravity anomaly models. The red line is the normal distribution curve. a. Grav-1-Grav-2; b. Grav-1-Grav-3; c. Grav-1-Grav-4; d. Grav-1-Grav-5; e. Grav-1-Grav-6; f. Grav-2-Grav-3; g. Grav-2-Grav-4; h. Grav-2-Grav-5; i. Grav-2-Grav-6; j. Grav-3-Grav-4; k. Grav-3-Grav-5; l. Grav-3-Grav-6; m. Grav-4-Grav-5; n. Grav-4-Grav-6; o. Grav-5-Grav-6.
Figure 7. Histogram distribution of difference between marine gravity anomaly models and the ship-borne gravity data. The red line is the normal distribution curve. a. Grav-1-NCEI; b. Grav-2-NCEI; c. Grav-3-NCEI; d. Grav-4-NCEI; e. Grav-5 -NCEI; f. Grav-6-NCEI.
Figure 8. Distribution of differences between Grav-3 and the ship-borne gravity data at depth >4 km