Volume 43 Issue 5
May  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Xiaoheng Mou, Wenming Lin. An improved wind quality control for the China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) scatterometer[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2024, 43(5): 100-109. doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2322-y
Citation: Xiaoheng Mou, Wenming Lin. An improved wind quality control for the China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) scatterometer[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2024, 43(5): 100-109. doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2322-y

An improved wind quality control for the China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) scatterometer

doi: 10.1007/s13131-024-2322-y
Funds:  The National Key Research and Development Program of China under contract Nos 2022YFC3104900 and 2022YFC3104902.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: wenminglin@nuist.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2023-12-26
  • Accepted Date: 2024-02-28
  • Available Online: 2024-04-30
  • Publish Date: 2024-05-30
  • Quality control (QC) is an essential procedure in scatterometer wind retrieval, which is used to distinguish good-quality data from poor-quality wind vector cells (WVCs) for the sake of wind applications. The current wind processor of the China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) scatterometer (CSCAT) adopts a maximum likelihood estimator (MLE)-based QC method to filter WVCs affected by geophysical noise, such as rainfall and wind variability. As the first Ku-band rotating fan-beam scatterometer, CSCAT can acquire up to 16 observations over a single WVC, giving abundant information with diverse incidence/azimuth angles, as such its MLE statistical characteristics may be different from the previous scatterometers. In this study, several QC indicators, including MLE, its spatially averaged value (MLEm), and the singularity exponents (SE), are analyzed using the collocated Global Precipitation Mission rainfall data as well as buoy data, to compare their sensitivity to rainfall and wind quality. The results show that wind error characteristics of CSCAT under different QC methods are similar to those of other Ku-band scatterometers, i.e., SE is more suitable than other parameters for the wind QC at outer-swath and nadir regions, while MLEm is the best QC indicator for the sweet region WVCs. Specifically, SE is much more favorable than others at high wind speeds. By combining different indicators, an improved QC method is developed for CSCAT. The validation with the collocated buoy data shows that it accepts more WVCs, and in turn, improves the quality control of CSCAT wind data.
  • loading
  • Brennan M J, Hennon C C, Knabb R D. 2009. The operational use of QuikSCAT ocean surface vector winds at the National Hurricane Center. Weather and Forecasting, 24(3): 621–645, doi: 10.1175/2008WAF2222188.1
    Chen Yaodeng, Cui Yemeng, Lin Wenming, et al. 2023. The impacts of assimilating CFOSAT scatterometer winds for Typhoon cases based on real-time rain quality control. Atmospheric Research, 285: 106621, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106621
    Huddleston J N, Stiles B W. 2000. A multidimensional histogram rain-flagging technique for SeaWinds on QuikSCAT. In: Proceedings of the IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Honolulu, HI, USA: IEEE, 3: 1232–1234,doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2000.858077
    Huffman G J, Bolvin D T, Braithwaite D, et al. 2018. NASA global precipitation measurement (GPM) integrated multi-satellite retrievals for GPM (IMERG). Greenbelt, MD, USA: NASA.https://gpm.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/document_files/IMERG_ATBD_V5.2_0.pdf [2018-02-07/2023-12-20]
    Lang Shuyan, Lin Wenming, Zhang Yi, et al. 2022. On the quality control of HY-2 scatterometer high winds. Remote Sensing, 14(21): 5565, doi: 10.3390/rs14215565
    Lin Wenming, Dong Xiaolong, Portabella M, et al. 2019. A perspective on the performance of the CFOSAT rotating fan-beam scatterometer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(2): 627–639, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2858852
    Lin Wenming, Portabella M. 2017. Toward an improved wind quality control for RapidScat. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(7): 3922–3930, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2683720
    Lin Wenming, Portabella M, Stoffelen A, et al. 2014. Rain identification in ASCAT winds using singularity analysis. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(9): 1519–1523, doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2298095
    Lin Wenming, Portabella M, Stoffelen A, et al. 2015a. ASCAT wind quality control near rain. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(8): 4165–4177, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2392372
    Lin Wenming, Portabella M, Stoffelen A, et al. 2015b. ASCAT wind quality under high subcell wind variability conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(8): 5804–5819, doi: 10.1002/2015JC010861
    Lin Wenming, Portabella M, Turiel A, et al. 2016. An improved singularity analysis for ASCAT wind quality control: Application to low winds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(7): 3890–3898, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2529700
    Liu W T, Katsaros K B, Businger J A. 1979. Bulk parameterization of air-sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints at the interface. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 36(9): 1722–1735, doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<1722:BPOASE>2.0.CO;2
    Liu Jianqiang, Lin Wenming, Dong Xiaolong, et al. 2020. First results from the rotating fan beam scatterometer onboard CFOSAT. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(12): 8793–8806, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2990708
    Liu Siqi, Lin Wenming, Portabella M, et al. 2022. Characterization of tropical cyclone intensity using the HY-2B scatterometer wind data. Remote Sensing, 14(4): 1035, doi: 10.3390/rs14041035
    Mironov A S, Quilfen Y, Piolle J F, et al. 2023. A method for continues calibration of a rotating antenna scatterometer in application to CFOSAT measurements. In: Proceedings of the IGARSS 2023-2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Pasadena, CA, USA: IEEE, 4072–4075
    Mou Xiaoheng, Lin Wenming, He Yijun. 2023. Towards a consistent wind data record for the CFOSAT scatterometer. Remote Sensing, 15(8): 2081, doi: 10.3390/rs15082081
    Peng Yihuan, Xie Xuetong, Lin Mingsen, et al. 2021. A study of sea surface rain identification based on HY-2A scatterometer. Remote Sensing, 13(17): 3475, doi: 10.3390/rs13173475
    Pierson Jr W J. 1989. Probabilities and statistics for backscatter estimates obtained by a scatterometer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 94(C7): 9743–9759
    Portabella M, Lin Wenming, Stoffelen A, et al. 2021. Consolidation of quality control procedures for scatterometers. In: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. Brussels, Belgium: IEEE, 1630–1633
    Portabella M, Stoffelen A. 2001. Rain detection and quality control of SeaWinds. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18(7): 1171–1183, doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1171:RDA QCO>2.0.CO;2
    Portabella M, Stoffelen A. 2002a. A comparison of KNMI quality control and JPL rain flag for SeaWinds. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(3): 424–430, doi: 10.5589/m02-040
    Portabella M, Stoffelen A. 2002b. Characterization of residual information for SeaWinds quality control. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 40(12): 2747–2759, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.807750
    Portabella M, Stoffelen A, Lin Wenming, et al. 2012. Rain effects on ASCAT-retrieved winds: Toward an improved quality control. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(7): 2495–2506, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2185933
    Prakash S, Mitra A K, Pai D S, et al. 2016. From TRMM to GPM: How well can heavy rainfall be detected from space?. Advances in Water Resources, 88: 1–7
    Stiles B W, Dunbar R S. 2010. A neural network technique for improving the accuracy of scatterometer winds in rainy conditions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(8): 3114–3122, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2049362
    Stiles B W, Yueh S H. 2002. Impact of rain on spaceborne Ku-band wind scatterometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(9): 1973–1983, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.803846
    Stoffelen A, Anderson D. 1997. Scatterometer data interpretation: Measurement space and inversion. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 14(6): 1298–1313, doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<1298:SDIMSA>2.0.CO;2
    Stoffelen A, Portabella M. 2006. On Bayesian scatterometer wind inversion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44(6): 1523–1533, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.862502
    Tournadre J, Quilfen Y. 2003. Impact of rain cell on scatterometer data: 1. Theory and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 108(C7): 3225
    Verhoef A, Vogelzang J, Verspeek J, et al. 2015. PenWP user manual and reference guide. KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands: NWP SAF Rep. NWPSAF-KN-UD-009. https://knmi-scatterometer-website-prd.s3.amazonaws.com/publications/NWPSAF-KN-UD-009_PenWP_User_Guide_v4.0.pdf [2022–08/2023–12–23]
    Weissman D E, Bourassa M A. 2008. Measurements of the effect of rain-induced sea surface roughness on the QuikSCAT scatterometer radar cross section. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(10): 2882–2894, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2001032
    Xu Ying, Liu Jianqiang, Xie Lingling, et al. 2019. China-France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT) simultaneously observes the typhoon-induced wind and wave fields. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 38(11): 158–161, doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1506-3
    Xu Xingou, Stoffelen A. 2020. Improved rain screening for Ku-band wind scatterometry. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 58(4): 2494–2503, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2951726
    Xu Xingou, Stoffelen A, Lin Wenming, et al. 2022. Rain false-alarm-rate reduction for CSCAT. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19: 1–5
    Zhao Xiaokang, Lin Wenming, Portabella M, et al. 2022. Effects of rain on CFOSAT scatterometer measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 274: 113015, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113015
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (85) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return