Volume 39 Issue 3
Apr.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jingchun Zhang, Jian Ma, Jing Che, Zhenqiang Zhou, Guoping Gao. Surface warming patterns dominate the uncertainty in global water vapor plus lapse rate feedback[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39(3): 81-89. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1531-2
Citation: Jingchun Zhang, Jian Ma, Jing Che, Zhenqiang Zhou, Guoping Gao. Surface warming patterns dominate the uncertainty in global water vapor plus lapse rate feedback[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2020, 39(3): 81-89. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1531-2

Surface warming patterns dominate the uncertainty in global water vapor plus lapse rate feedback

doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1531-2
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41675070; the Shanghai Eastern Scholar Program under contract No. TP2015049; the Expert Development Fund under contract No. 2017033; the China Scholarship Council under contract No. 201506330007.
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: Jian.Ma@SJTU.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2019-04-28
  • Accepted Date: 2019-06-03
  • Available Online: 2020-04-21
  • Publish Date: 2020-03-25
  • Climate feedbacks have been usually estimated using changes in radiative effects associated with increased global-mean surface temperature. Feedback uncertainties, however, are not only functions of global-mean surface temperature increase. In projections by global climate models, it has been demonstrated that the geographical variation of sea surface temperature change brings significant uncertainties into atmospheric circulation and precipitation responses at regional scales. Here we show that the spatial pattern of surface warming is a major contributor to uncertainty in the combined water vapour-lapse rate feedback. This is demonstrated by computing the global-mean radiative effects of changes in air temperature and relative humidity simulated by 31 climate models using a methodology based on radiative kernels. Our results highlight the important contribution of regional climate change to the uncertainty in climate feedbacks, and identify the regions of the world where constraining surface warming patterns would be most effective for higher skill of climate projections.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Bony S, Colman R, Kattsov V M, et al. 2006. How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?. Journal of Climate, 19(15): 3445–3482. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3819.1
    Cess R D. 2005. Water vapor feedback in climate models. Science, 310(5749): 795–796. doi: 10.1126/science.1119258
    Colman R. 2004. On the structure of water vapour feedbacks in climate models. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(21): L21109
    Ding Qinghua, Wallace J M, Battisti D S, et al. 2014. Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming in northeastern Canada and Greenland. Nature, 509(7499): 209–212. doi: 10.1038/nature13260
    Feldl N, Roe G H. 2013. The nonlinear and nonlocal nature of climate feedbacks. Journal of Climate, 26(21): 8289–8304. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00631.1
    Held I M, Shell K M. 2012. Using relative humidity as a state variable in climate feedback analysis. Journal of Climate, 25(8): 2578–2582. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00721.1
    Held I M, Soden B J. 2000. Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25: 441–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.441
    Held I M, Soden B J. 2006. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. Journal of Climate, 19(21): 5686–5699. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3990.1
    Huang Ping, Ying Jun. 2015. A multimodel ensemble pattern regression method to correct the tropical Pacific SST change patterns under global warming. Journal of Climate, 28(12): 4706–4723. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00833.1
    Jackson L C, Peterson K A, Roberts C D, et al. 2016. Recent slowing of Atlantic overturning circulation as a recovery from earlier strengthening. Nature Geoscience, 9(7): 518–522. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2715
    Kosaka Y, Xie Shangping. 2013. Recent global-warming hiatus tied to equatorial Pacific surface cooling. Nature, 501(7467): 403–407. doi: 10.1038/nature12534
    Li Gen, Xie Shangping, Du Yan, et al. 2016. Effects of excessive equatorial cold tongue bias on the projections of tropical Pacific climate change. Part I: the warming pattern in CMIP5 multi-model ensemble. Climate Dynamics, 47(12): 3817–3831
    Long Shangmin, Xie Shangping, Liu Wei. 2016. Uncertainty in tropical rainfall projections: Atmospheric circulation effect and the ocean coupling. Journal of Climate, 29(7): 2671–2687. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0601.1
    Ma Jian, Xie Shangping. 2013. Regional patterns of sea surface temperature change: A source of uncertainty in future projections of precipitation and atmospheric circulation. Journal of Climate, 26(8): 2482–2501. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00283.1
    Ma Jian, Xie Shangping, Kosaka Y. 2012. Mechanisms for tropical tropospheric circulation change in response to global warming. Journal of Climate, 25(8): 2979–2994. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00048.1
    Ma Jian, Yu Jinyi. 2014. Linking centennial surface warming patterns in the equatorial Pacific to the relative strengths of the Walker and Hadley circulations. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 71(9): 3454–3464. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-14-0028.1
    Mahlstein I, Knutti R. 2011. Ocean heat transport as a cause for model uncertainty in projected Arctic warming. Journal of Climate, 24(5): 1451–1460. doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3713.1
    Minschwaner K, Dessler A E. 2004. Water vapor feedback in the tropical upper troposphere: Model results and observations. Journal of Climate, 17(6): 1272–1282. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<1272:WVFITT>2.0.CO;2
    Perlwitz J, Hoerling M, Dole R. 2015. Arctic tropospheric warming: Causes and linkages to lower latitudes. Journal of Climate, 28(6): 2154–2167. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00095.1
    Sherwood S C, Roca R, Weckwerth T M, et al. 2010a. Tropospheric water vapor, convection, and climate. Reviews of Geophysics, 48(2): RG2001
    Sherwood S C, Ingram W, Tsushima Y, et al. 2010b. Relative humidity changes in a warmer climate. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmosphere, 115(D9): D09104
    Soden B J, Held I M. 2006. An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. Journal of Climate, 19(14): 3354–3360. doi: 10.1175/JCLI3799.1
    Soden B J, Held I M, Colman R, et al. 2008. Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. Journal of Climate, 21(14): 3504–3520. doi: 10.1175/2007JCLI2110.1
    Solomon S, Rosenlof K H, Portmann R W, et al. 2010. Contributions of stratospheric water vapor to decadal changes in the rate of global warming. Science, 327(5970): 1219–1223. doi: 10.1126/science.1182488
    Taylor K E, Stouffer R J, Meehl G A. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4): 485–498. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1
    The GFDL Global Atmospheric Model Development Team. 2004. The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations. Journal of Climate, 17(24): 4641–4673. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-3223.1
    Wang Chuanyang, Xie Shangping, Kosaka Y, et al. 2017. Global influence of tropical Pacific variability with implications for global warming slowdown. Journal of Climate, 30(7): 2679–2695. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0496.1
    Wright J S, Sobel A, Galewsky J. 2010. Diagnosis of zonal mean relative humidity changes in a warmer climate. Journal of Climate, 23(17): 4556–4569. doi: 10.1175/2010JCLI3488.1
    Xie Shangping, Deser C, Vecchi G A, et al. 2010. Global warming pattern formation: Sea surface temperature and rainfall. Journal of Climate, 23(4): 966–986. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1
    Xie Shangping, Deser C, Vecchi G A, et al. 2015. Towards predictive understanding of regional climate change. Nature Climate Change, 5(10): 921–930. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2689
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索


    Article Metrics

    Article views (374) PDF downloads(34) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint